TSTP Solution File: SWC367+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWC367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:03:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.67s 0.91s
% Output : Refutation 0.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 4 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
ssList(skc5),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
ssList(skc4),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(51,axiom,
~ rearsegP(skc5,skc4),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(60,axiom,
( skP0(u,v)
| equal(nil,u) ),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(65,axiom,
( ~ ssList(u)
| rearsegP(u,nil) ),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(70,axiom,
( ~ skP0(skc4,skc5)
| rearsegP(skc5,skc4) ),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(185,axiom,
( ~ ssList(u)
| ~ ssList(v)
| ~ equal(tl(u),tl(v))
| ~ equal(hd(u),hd(v))
| equal(u,v)
| equal(nil,v)
| equal(nil,u) ),
file('SWC367+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(194,plain,
~ skP0(skc4,skc5),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[70,51]),
[iquote('0:MRR:70.1,51.0')] ).
cnf(283,plain,
( ~ ssList(u)
| ~ equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))
| ~ equal(hd(skc4),hd(u))
| equal(nil,u)
| equal(skc4,u)
| equal(skc4,nil) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,185]),
[iquote('0:Res:2.0,185.1')] ).
cnf(451,plain,
rearsegP(skc5,nil),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,65]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,65.0')] ).
cnf(550,plain,
equal(skc4,nil),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[283]),
[iquote('1:Spt:283.5')] ).
cnf(660,plain,
~ rearsegP(skc5,nil),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[550,51]),
[iquote('1:Rew:550.0,51.0')] ).
cnf(703,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[660,451]),
[iquote('1:MRR:660.0,451.0')] ).
cnf(807,plain,
~ equal(skc4,nil),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[703,550]),
[iquote('1:Spt:703.0,283.5,550.0')] ).
cnf(808,plain,
( ~ ssList(u)
| ~ equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))
| ~ equal(hd(skc4),hd(u))
| equal(nil,u)
| equal(skc4,u) ),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[283]),
[iquote('1:Spt:703.0,283.0,283.1,283.2,283.3,283.4')] ).
cnf(1134,plain,
equal(skc4,nil),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[60,194]),
[iquote('0:Res:60.0,194.0')] ).
cnf(1135,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1134,807]),
[iquote('1:MRR:1134.0,807.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SWC367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 12:47:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.67/0.91 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.67/0.91 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.67/0.91 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.67/0.91 SPASS derived 697 clauses, backtracked 356 clauses, performed 21 splits and kept 1071 clauses.
% 0.67/0.91 SPASS allocated 98897 KBytes.
% 0.67/0.91 SPASS spent 0:00:00.57 on the problem.
% 0.67/0.91 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.67/0.91 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.67/0.91 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.67/0.91 0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.67/0.91 0:00:00.30 for the reduction.
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 17 :
% 0.67/0.91 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.67/0.91 Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax51 ax77
% 0.67/0.91
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------