TSTP Solution File: SWC365+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SWC365+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 07:57:37 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.23s
% Output   : Solution 1.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23119/SWC365+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23119/SWC365+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23119/SWC365+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 23215
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.031 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(96, conjecture,![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|~(neq(X2,nil)))|rearsegP(X2,X1))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(neq(X4,nil)&(~(neq(X3,nil))|~(rearsegP(X4,X3))))))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(97, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|~(neq(X2,nil)))|rearsegP(X2,X1))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(neq(X4,nil)&(~(neq(X3,nil))|~(rearsegP(X4,X3)))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[96])).
% fof(103, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ssList(X1)=>![X2]:(ssList(X2)=>![X3]:(ssList(X3)=>![X4]:(ssList(X4)=>(((((~(X2=X4)|~(X1=X3))|~(neq(X2,nil)))|rearsegP(X2,X1))|(~(nil=X3)&nil=X4))|(neq(X4,nil)&(~(neq(X3,nil))|~(rearsegP(X4,X3)))))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[97,theory(equality)])).
% fof(568, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(ssList(X1)&?[X2]:(ssList(X2)&?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&?[X4]:(ssList(X4)&(((((X2=X4&X1=X3)&neq(X2,nil))&~(rearsegP(X2,X1)))&(nil=X3|~(nil=X4)))&(~(neq(X4,nil))|(neq(X3,nil)&rearsegP(X4,X3)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[103])).
% fof(569, negated_conjecture,?[X5]:(ssList(X5)&?[X6]:(ssList(X6)&?[X7]:(ssList(X7)&?[X8]:(ssList(X8)&(((((X6=X8&X5=X7)&neq(X6,nil))&~(rearsegP(X6,X5)))&(nil=X7|~(nil=X8)))&(~(neq(X8,nil))|(neq(X7,nil)&rearsegP(X8,X7)))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[568])).
% fof(570, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&(((((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&neq(esk49_0,nil))&~(rearsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)))&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&(~(neq(esk51_0,nil))|(neq(esk50_0,nil)&rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)))))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[569])).
% fof(571, negated_conjecture,(ssList(esk48_0)&(ssList(esk49_0)&(ssList(esk50_0)&(ssList(esk51_0)&(((((esk49_0=esk51_0&esk48_0=esk50_0)&neq(esk49_0,nil))&~(rearsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)))&(nil=esk50_0|~(nil=esk51_0)))&((neq(esk50_0,nil)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil)))&(rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|~(neq(esk51_0,nil))))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[570])).
% cnf(572,negated_conjecture,(rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|~neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(575,negated_conjecture,(~rearsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(576,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk49_0,nil)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(577,negated_conjecture,(esk48_0=esk50_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(578,negated_conjecture,(esk49_0=esk51_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[571])).
% cnf(583,negated_conjecture,(~rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[575,578,theory(equality)]),577,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(588,negated_conjecture,(neq(esk51_0,nil)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[576,578,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(591,negated_conjecture,(rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[572,588,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(592,negated_conjecture,(rearsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[591,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(593,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[592,583,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(594,negated_conjecture,($false),593,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 13
% # ...of these trivial                : 2
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 11
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 0
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 10
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 7
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 1
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 186
% # ...number of literals in the above : 703
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:    14 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            7 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           12 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.029 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.032 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.21 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.21 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23119/SWC365+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------