TSTP Solution File: SWC363+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC363+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:28:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.32s 18.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 171 ( 36 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 227 ( 92 ~; 89 |; 25 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 19 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 20 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 0 sgn 32 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| segmentP(X2,X1)
| ( nil != X3
& nil = X4 )
| ( ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
| ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
& neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(ax81,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax81) ).
fof(ax7,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ( segmentP(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
& ? [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
& app(app(X3,X2),X4) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax7) ).
fof(ax82,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> app(app(X1,X2),X3) = app(X1,app(X2,X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax82) ).
fof(ax3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> ( memberP(X1,X2)
<=> ? [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
& ? [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
& app(X3,cons(X2,X4)) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax3) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| segmentP(X2,X1)
| ( nil != X3
& nil = X4 )
| ( ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
| ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
& neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& neq(esk2_0,nil)
& ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& ( nil = esk3_0
| nil != esk4_0 )
& ( ssItem(esk5_0)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
& ( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
& ( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| cons(X4,X3) = app(cons(X4,nil),X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk2_0,nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk5_0)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X5,X6,X9,X10] :
( ( ssList(esk12_2(X5,X6))
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ssList(esk13_2(X5,X6))
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( app(app(esk12_2(X5,X6),X6),esk13_2(X5,X6)) = X5
| ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ~ ssList(X9)
| ~ ssList(X10)
| app(app(X9,X6),X10) != X5
| segmentP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax7])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X5)
| ~ ssList(X6)
| app(app(X4,X5),X6) = app(X4,app(X5,X6)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax82])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X5,X6,X9,X10] :
( ( ssList(esk8_2(X5,X6))
| ~ memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ssList(esk9_2(X5,X6))
| ~ memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( app(esk8_2(X5,X6),cons(X6,esk9_2(X5,X6))) = X5
| ~ memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) )
& ( ~ ssList(X9)
| ~ ssList(X10)
| app(X9,cons(X6,X10)) != X5
| memberP(X5,X6)
| ~ ssItem(X6)
| ~ ssList(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( cons(X1,X2) = app(cons(X1,nil),X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(esk5_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( segmentP(X1,X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( app(app(X1,X2),X3) = app(X1,app(X2,X3))
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( app(esk8_2(X1,X2),cons(X2,esk9_2(X1,X2))) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,X1) = app(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( segmentP(X1,X2)
| app(X3,app(X2,X4)) != X1
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( app(esk8_2(X1,esk5_0),app(esk1_0,esk9_2(X1,esk5_0))) = X1
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(esk9_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(esk9_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(esk8_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ssList(esk9_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(esk8_2(X1,esk5_0))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ssList(esk8_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ memberP(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
| ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ memberP(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
memberP(esk2_0,esk5_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWC363+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 17:39:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.32/18.49 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.32/18.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.32/18.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.32/18.49
% 0.32/18.49 # Proof found!
% 0.32/18.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.32/18.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object total steps : 36
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object clause steps : 25
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object conjectures : 21
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object clause conjectures : 18
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object initial clauses used : 15
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.32/18.50 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 25
% 0.32/18.50 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.32/18.50 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.32/18.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 66
% 0.32/18.50 # Initial clauses : 61
% 0.32/18.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.32/18.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 0.32/18.50 # Processed clauses : 77214
% 0.32/18.50 # ...of these trivial : 426
% 0.32/18.50 # ...subsumed : 71205
% 0.32/18.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 5583
% 0.32/18.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 310
% 0.32/18.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 80797
% 0.32/18.50 # Backward-subsumed : 1411
% 0.32/18.50 # Backward-rewritten : 201
% 0.32/18.50 # Generated clauses : 327229
% 0.32/18.50 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 287010
% 0.32/18.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 37095
% 0.32/18.50 # Paramodulations : 326577
% 0.32/18.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.32/18.50 # Equation resolutions : 652
% 0.32/18.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 3968
% 0.32/18.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 114
% 0.32/18.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/18.50 # Negative unit clauses : 199
% 0.32/18.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 3655
% 0.32/18.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 106968
% 0.32/18.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 501485
% 0.32/18.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.32/18.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 1612
% 0.32/18.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20846787
% 0.32/18.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6870917
% 0.32/18.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 77380
% 0.32/18.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44814
% 0.32/18.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.32/18.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 828
% 0.32/18.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 44
% 0.32/18.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.32/18.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.32/18.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6805287
% 0.32/18.50
% 0.32/18.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/18.50 # User time : 17.217 s
% 0.32/18.50 # System time : 0.130 s
% 0.32/18.50 # Total time : 17.347 s
% 0.32/18.50 # Maximum resident set size: 135352 pages
% 0.32/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.32/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------