TSTP Solution File: SWC361+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC361+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:15:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.31s 2.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 4 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnlazghg/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnlazghg/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).
cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnlazghg/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).
cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lnlazghg/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).
cnf(c_0_202,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_203,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
i_0_196 ).
cnf(c_0_204,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0),
i_0_194 ).
cnf(c_0_205,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_197 ).
cnf(c_0_206,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk50_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_202,c_0_203]) ).
cnf(c_0_207,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_204,c_0_205]),c_0_206]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC361+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:52:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.31/2.36 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.31/2.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.31/2.36 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.31/2.36 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.31/2.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.31/2.36 #
% 7.31/2.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.31/2.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.31/2.36
% 7.31/2.36 # Proof found!
% 7.31/2.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.31/2.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.31/2.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.31/2.36
% 7.31/2.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.31/2.36 # User time : 0.013 s
% 7.31/2.36 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.31/2.36 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 7.31/2.36 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.31/2.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------