TSTP Solution File: SWC359+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:55:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.54s 0.87s
% Output : Proof 3.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.15 % Problem : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.16 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.17/0.37 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 18:36:09 EDT 2023
% 0.24/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 3.54/0.87 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.54/0.87 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 3.54/0.87 fof(co1, conjecture, ![U]: (ssList(U) => ![V]: (ssList(V) => ![W]: (ssList(W) => ![X]: (ssList(X) => (V!=X | (U!=W | (~neq(V, nil) | (~segmentP(X, W) | (~equalelemsP(W) | (?[Y]: (ssList(Y) & (neq(W, Y) & (segmentP(X, Y) & (segmentP(Y, W) & equalelemsP(Y))))) | segmentP(V, U)))))))))))).
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 3.54/0.87 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 3.54/0.87 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 3.54/0.87 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 3.54/0.87 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 3.54/0.87 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 3.54/0.87 variables of u and v.
% 3.54/0.87 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 3.54/0.87 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 Axiom 1 (co1_1): v = x.
% 3.54/0.87 Axiom 2 (co1): u = w.
% 3.54/0.87 Axiom 3 (co1_7): segmentP(x, w) = true2.
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 Goal 1 (co1_10): segmentP(v, u) = true2.
% 3.54/0.87 Proof:
% 3.54/0.87 segmentP(v, u)
% 3.54/0.87 = { by axiom 2 (co1) }
% 3.54/0.87 segmentP(v, w)
% 3.54/0.87 = { by axiom 1 (co1_1) }
% 3.54/0.87 segmentP(x, w)
% 3.54/0.87 = { by axiom 3 (co1_7) }
% 3.54/0.87 true2
% 3.54/0.87 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.54/0.87
% 3.54/0.87 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------