TSTP Solution File: SWC359+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:43:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 81 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 28 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 10 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f484,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f425,f423]) ).
fof(f423,plain,
~ segmentP(sK3,sK4),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f248,f245]) ).
fof(f245,plain,
sK2 = sK4,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& ssList(X3)
& segmentP(X3,X2)
& X0 = X2
& neq(X1,nil)
& X1 = X3
& ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ equalelemsP(X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4) )
& equalelemsP(X2) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f163]) ).
fof(f163,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( segmentP(X3,X2)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ equalelemsP(X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4) )
& equalelemsP(X2)
& ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
& X1 = X3
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
| ? [X4] :
( segmentP(X4,X2)
& equalelemsP(X4)
& neq(X2,X4)
& ssList(X4)
& segmentP(X3,X4) )
| ~ equalelemsP(X2)
| segmentP(X1,X0)
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
| ? [X4] :
( segmentP(X4,X2)
& equalelemsP(X4)
& neq(X2,X4)
& ssList(X4)
& segmentP(X3,X4) )
| ~ equalelemsP(X2)
| segmentP(X1,X0)
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f248,plain,
~ segmentP(sK3,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
fof(f425,plain,
segmentP(sK3,sK4),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f246,f243]) ).
fof(f243,plain,
sK5 = sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
fof(f246,plain,
segmentP(sK5,sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 18:47:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 % (14139)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (14123)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (14124)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (14131)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (14115)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14123)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52 % (14125)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14112)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14111)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14114)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14133)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14113)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (14119)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (14119)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.53 % (14119)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (14119)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Time elapsed: 0.121 s
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (14123)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (14110)Success in time 0.185 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------