TSTP Solution File: SWC359+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:40:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  190 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (  11 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  253 (  79   ~;  56   |; 106   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   9 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (  19   !;  26   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f631,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f561,f558]) ).

fof(f558,plain,
    segmentP(sK19,sK20),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f415,f412]) ).

fof(f412,plain,
    sK21 = sK19,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f265]) ).

fof(f265,plain,
    ( sK18 = sK20
    & segmentP(sK21,sK20)
    & ! [X4] :
        ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
        | ~ segmentP(sK21,X4)
        | ~ segmentP(X4,sK20)
        | ~ neq(sK20,X4)
        | ~ ssList(X4) )
    & ssList(sK21)
    & sK21 = sK19
    & ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18)
    & neq(sK19,nil)
    & equalelemsP(sK20)
    & ssList(sK20)
    & ssList(sK19)
    & ssList(sK18) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK18,sK19,sK20,sK21])],[f169,f264,f263,f262,f261]) ).

fof(f261,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( X0 = X2
                    & segmentP(X3,X2)
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                        | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                        | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                        | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                        | ~ ssList(X4) )
                    & ssList(X3)
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
                    & neq(X1,nil)
                    & equalelemsP(X2) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( sK18 = X2
                  & segmentP(X3,X2)
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                      | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ~ segmentP(X1,sK18)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & equalelemsP(X2) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK18) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( sK18 = X2
                & segmentP(X3,X2)
                & ! [X4] :
                    ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                    | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                    | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                    | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                    | ~ ssList(X4) )
                & ssList(X3)
                & X1 = X3
                & ~ segmentP(X1,sK18)
                & neq(X1,nil)
                & equalelemsP(X2) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( sK18 = X2
              & segmentP(X3,X2)
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                  | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                  | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                  | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                  | ~ ssList(X4) )
              & ssList(X3)
              & sK19 = X3
              & ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18)
              & neq(sK19,nil)
              & equalelemsP(X2) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK19) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( sK18 = X2
            & segmentP(X3,X2)
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                | ~ ssList(X4) )
            & ssList(X3)
            & sK19 = X3
            & ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18)
            & neq(sK19,nil)
            & equalelemsP(X2) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( sK18 = sK20
          & segmentP(X3,sK20)
          & ! [X4] :
              ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
              | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
              | ~ segmentP(X4,sK20)
              | ~ neq(sK20,X4)
              | ~ ssList(X4) )
          & ssList(X3)
          & sK19 = X3
          & ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18)
          & neq(sK19,nil)
          & equalelemsP(sK20) )
      & ssList(sK20) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f264,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( sK18 = sK20
        & segmentP(X3,sK20)
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
            | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
            | ~ segmentP(X4,sK20)
            | ~ neq(sK20,X4)
            | ~ ssList(X4) )
        & ssList(X3)
        & sK19 = X3
        & ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18)
        & neq(sK19,nil)
        & equalelemsP(sK20) )
   => ( sK18 = sK20
      & segmentP(sK21,sK20)
      & ! [X4] :
          ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
          | ~ segmentP(sK21,X4)
          | ~ segmentP(X4,sK20)
          | ~ neq(sK20,X4)
          | ~ ssList(X4) )
      & ssList(sK21)
      & sK21 = sK19
      & ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18)
      & neq(sK19,nil)
      & equalelemsP(sK20) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X0 = X2
                  & segmentP(X3,X2)
                  & ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                      | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & equalelemsP(X2) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f168]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ equalelemsP(X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X3,X4)
                      | ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
                      | ~ neq(X2,X4)
                      | ~ ssList(X4) )
                  & segmentP(X3,X2)
                  & ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & equalelemsP(X2)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ? [X4] :
                          ( segmentP(X3,X4)
                          & ssList(X4)
                          & equalelemsP(X4)
                          & neq(X2,X4)
                          & segmentP(X4,X2) )
                      | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
                      | segmentP(X1,X0)
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ~ equalelemsP(X2)
                      | X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ? [X4] :
                        ( segmentP(X3,X4)
                        & ssList(X4)
                        & equalelemsP(X4)
                        & neq(X2,X4)
                        & segmentP(X4,X2) )
                    | ~ segmentP(X3,X2)
                    | segmentP(X1,X0)
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ~ equalelemsP(X2)
                    | X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f415,plain,
    segmentP(sK21,sK20),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f265]) ).

fof(f561,plain,
    ~ segmentP(sK19,sK20),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f411,f416]) ).

fof(f416,plain,
    sK18 = sK20,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f265]) ).

fof(f411,plain,
    ~ segmentP(sK19,sK18),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f265]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:00:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  % (12067)dis+1002_1:12_drc=off:fd=preordered:tgt=full:i=99978:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99978Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (12085)ott+1010_1:1_sd=2:sos=on:sp=occurrence:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (12067)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51  % (12071)lrs+10_1:1024_nm=0:nwc=5.0:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (12072)dis+21_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=included:to=lpo:i=15:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (12075)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (12078)lrs+10_1:2_br=off:nm=4:ss=included:urr=on:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (12076)lrs+10_1:1_br=off:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=2.0:urr=on:i=33:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/33Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (12074)lrs+2_1:1_lcm=reverse:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:urr=on:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 1.27/0.52  % (12077)lrs+10_1:1_ep=R:lcm=predicate:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal:ss=included:i=12:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 1.27/0.52  % (12090)dis+10_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:ss=included:st=2.0:to=lpo:urr=ec_only:i=45:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/45Mi)
% 1.27/0.52  % (12089)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.27/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.27/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.27/0.52  
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Memory used [KB]: 6396
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Time elapsed: 0.101 s
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (12067)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (12066)Success in time 0.174 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------