TSTP Solution File: SWC355+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWC355+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:28:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 1.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  126 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  151 (  58   ~;  57   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn  22   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => app(X3,cons(X5,nil)) != X4 )
                        | segmentP(X2,X1) )
                      & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                        | neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).

fof(ax7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( segmentP(X1,X2)
          <=> ? [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
                & ? [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                    & app(app(X3,X2),X4) = X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax7) ).

fof(ax28,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax28) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(ax16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ( ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | ! [X5] :
                              ( ssItem(X5)
                             => app(X3,cons(X5,nil)) != X4 )
                          | segmentP(X2,X1) )
                        & ( ~ neq(X2,nil)
                          | neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk1_0)
    & ssList(esk2_0)
    & ssList(esk3_0)
    & ssList(esk4_0)
    & esk2_0 = esk4_0
    & esk1_0 = esk3_0
    & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
      | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
    & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
    & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
      | ssItem(esk5_0) )
    & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | ssItem(esk5_0) )
    & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
      | app(esk3_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk4_0 )
    & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | app(esk3_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk4_0 )
    & ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
      | ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
    & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X9,X10] :
      ( ( ssList(esk8_2(X5,X6))
        | ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
        | ~ ssList(X6)
        | ~ ssList(X5) )
      & ( ssList(esk9_2(X5,X6))
        | ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
        | ~ ssList(X6)
        | ~ ssList(X5) )
      & ( app(app(esk8_2(X5,X6),X6),esk9_2(X5,X6)) = X5
        | ~ segmentP(X5,X6)
        | ~ ssList(X6)
        | ~ ssList(X5) )
      & ( ~ ssList(X9)
        | ~ ssList(X10)
        | app(app(X9,X6),X10) != X5
        | segmentP(X5,X6)
        | ~ ssList(X6)
        | ~ ssList(X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax7])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ ssList(X2)
      | app(nil,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk2_0,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(app(X3,X2),X4) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( app(nil,X1) = X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(esk3_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk4_0
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk4_0,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( segmentP(X1,X2)
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk1_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk4_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ ssList(X3)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | ssList(cons(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk5_0)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(esk4_0,esk1_0)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
    | esk4_0 != X1
    | ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil))
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ssList(cons(X1,X2))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(esk4_0,esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(X1,esk1_0)
    | esk4_0 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_14]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08  % Problem  : SWC355+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.09  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.08/0.27  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.27  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 06:25:55 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/1.34  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.13/1.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.13/1.34  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 0.13/1.34  
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof found!
% 0.13/1.34  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/1.34  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object total steps             : 33
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object clause steps            : 23
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object formula steps           : 10
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object conjectures             : 21
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 18
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.13/1.34  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 20
% 0.13/1.34  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.13/1.34  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.13/1.34  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 70
% 0.13/1.34  # Initial clauses                      : 52
% 0.13/1.34  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 52
% 0.13/1.34  # Processed clauses                    : 1222
% 0.13/1.34  # ...of these trivial                  : 54
% 0.13/1.34  # ...subsumed                          : 864
% 0.13/1.34  # ...remaining for further processing  : 304
% 0.13/1.34  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.13/1.34  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # Backward-subsumed                    : 28
% 0.13/1.34  # Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.13/1.34  # Generated clauses                    : 3564
% 0.13/1.34  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2987
% 0.13/1.34  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 179
% 0.13/1.34  # Paramodulations                      : 3543
% 0.13/1.34  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # Equation resolutions                 : 21
% 0.13/1.34  # Current number of processed clauses  : 262
% 0.13/1.34  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 37
% 0.13/1.34  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/1.34  #    Negative unit clauses             : 30
% 0.13/1.34  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 195
% 0.13/1.34  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1646
% 0.13/1.34  # ...number of literals in the above   : 7554
% 0.13/1.34  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # Current number of archived clauses   : 40
% 0.13/1.34  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12444
% 0.13/1.34  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7821
% 0.13/1.34  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 347
% 0.13/1.34  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 268
% 0.13/1.34  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 43
% 0.13/1.34  # BW rewrite match successes           : 12
% 0.13/1.34  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/1.34  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 74495
% 0.13/1.34  
% 0.13/1.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/1.34  # User time                : 0.106 s
% 0.13/1.34  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.13/1.34  # Total time               : 0.112 s
% 0.13/1.34  # Maximum resident set size: 5028 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------