TSTP Solution File: SWC354-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC354-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.01s 1.18s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWC354-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:54:52 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.45 The process was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.45 Sat Jun 11 20:54:52 2022
% 0.21/0.45 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18032.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.45 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.45 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.45 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.45 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.45 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.45 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.21/0.45 140 back subsumes 139.
% 0.21/0.45 150 back subsumes 144.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.45 430 back subsumes 133.
% 0.21/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 431 during input processing: 0 [copy,431,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 337.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 281.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 280.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 279.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 269.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 256.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 255.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 254.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 217.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 205.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 204.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 203.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 202.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 185.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 182.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 180.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 176.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 173.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 150.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 149.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 148.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 147.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 146.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 138.
% 0.21/0.45 431 back subsumes 137.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.41/0.63 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.41/0.63 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.41/0.63 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.41/0.63 number of clauses initially in problem: 396
% 0.41/0.63 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.41/0.63 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.41/0.63 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.41/0.63 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.41/0.63 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.41/0.63 distinct function count: 46
% 0.41/0.63 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.41/0.63
% 0.41/0.63 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.01/1.17 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.01/1.17 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.01/1.17 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 true clauses given 1 (16.7%)
% 1.01/1.17 false clauses given 5
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 FALSE TRUE
% 1.01/1.17 2 3 3
% 1.01/1.17 3 41 3
% 1.01/1.17 4 7 0
% 1.01/1.17 5 1 0
% 1.01/1.17 7 0 29
% 1.01/1.17 9 0 21
% 1.01/1.17 10 0 2
% 1.01/1.17 11 1 43
% 1.01/1.17 12 0 18
% 1.01/1.17 13 0 25
% 1.01/1.17 14 0 8
% 1.01/1.17 15 0 22
% 1.01/1.17 16 0 14
% 1.01/1.17 17 0 12
% 1.01/1.17 19 0 7
% 1.01/1.17 21 0 18
% 1.01/1.17 22 0 10
% 1.01/1.17 23 0 6
% 1.01/1.17 tot: 53 241 (82.0% true)
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.01/1.17 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.01/1.17 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.01/1.17 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17
% 1.01/1.17 The job finished Sat Jun 11 20:54:53 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------