TSTP Solution File: SWC351+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC351+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 09:50:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 334 ( 111 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 40 ( 10 avg)
% Number of connectives : 464 ( 161 ~; 133 |; 150 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 10 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 130 ( 82 !; 48 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f346,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f345,f197]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
ssList(sK3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f162,plain,
( ( nil != sK2
| nil = sK3 )
& ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
& ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != sK2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != sK4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(sK2)
& sK3 = app(sK2,sK4)
& ssList(sK4)
& neq(sK1,nil)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3)
& ssList(sK2)
& ssList(sK1)
& ssList(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f99,f161,f160,f159,f158,f157]) ).
fof(f157,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(X1,X0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(X1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil)
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f158,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(X1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil)
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil)
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f159,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil)
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != sK2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(sK2)
& app(sK2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(sK2) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f160,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != sK2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != sK2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(sK2)
& app(sK2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( ( nil != sK2
| nil = sK3 )
& ~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != sK2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(sK2)
& app(sK2,X4) = sK3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(sK1,nil)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f161,plain,
( ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != sK2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(sK2)
& app(sK2,X4) = sK3
& ssList(X4) )
=> ( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != sK2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != sK4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(sK2)
& sK3 = app(sK2,sK4)
& ssList(sK4) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(X1,X0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( nil != X2
| nil = X3 )
& ~ frontsegP(X1,X0)
& ? [X4] :
( ! [X5] :
( ! [X6] :
( ! [X7] :
( ! [X8] :
( ~ lt(X7,X5)
| app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) != X2
| ~ ssList(X8) )
| ~ ssItem(X7) )
| app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
| ~ ssList(X6) )
| ~ ssItem(X5) )
& strictorderedP(X2)
& app(X2,X4) = X3
& ssList(X4) )
& neq(X1,nil)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( nil = X2
& nil != X3 )
| frontsegP(X1,X0)
| ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ? [X5] :
( ? [X6] :
( ? [X7] :
( ? [X8] :
( lt(X7,X5)
& app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) = X2
& ssList(X8) )
& ssItem(X7) )
& app(cons(X5,nil),X6) = X4
& ssList(X6) )
& ssItem(X5) )
| ~ strictorderedP(X2)
| app(X2,X4) != X3 ) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( nil = X2
& nil != X3 )
| frontsegP(X1,X0)
| ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ? [X5] :
( ? [X6] :
( ? [X7] :
( ? [X8] :
( lt(X7,X5)
& app(X8,cons(X7,nil)) = X2
& ssList(X8) )
& ssItem(X7) )
& app(cons(X5,nil),X6) = X4
& ssList(X6) )
& ssItem(X5) )
| ~ strictorderedP(X2)
| app(X2,X4) != X3 ) )
| ~ neq(X1,nil)
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hs7xOayPd8/Vampire---4.8_7395',co1) ).
fof(f345,plain,
~ ssList(sK3),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f344,f196]) ).
fof(f196,plain,
ssList(sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f344,plain,
( ~ ssList(sK2)
| ~ ssList(sK3) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f343,f201]) ).
fof(f201,plain,
ssList(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f343,plain,
( ~ ssList(sK4)
| ~ ssList(sK2)
| ~ ssList(sK3) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f320,f278]) ).
fof(f278,plain,
~ frontsegP(sK3,sK2),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f205,f198,f199]) ).
fof(f199,plain,
sK0 = sK2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f198,plain,
sK1 = sK3,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f205,plain,
~ frontsegP(sK1,sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f320,plain,
( frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
| ~ ssList(sK4)
| ~ ssList(sK2)
| ~ ssList(sK3) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f288,f202]) ).
fof(f202,plain,
sK3 = app(sK2,sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).
fof(f288,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( frontsegP(app(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(app(X1,X2)) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f246]) ).
fof(f246,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( frontsegP(X0,X1)
| app(X1,X2) != X0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f179]) ).
fof(f179,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( ( frontsegP(X0,X1)
| ! [X2] :
( app(X1,X2) != X0
| ~ ssList(X2) ) )
& ( ( app(X1,sK9(X0,X1)) = X0
& ssList(sK9(X0,X1)) )
| ~ frontsegP(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9])],[f177,f178]) ).
fof(f178,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X3] :
( app(X1,X3) = X0
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( app(X1,sK9(X0,X1)) = X0
& ssList(sK9(X0,X1)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f177,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( ( frontsegP(X0,X1)
| ! [X2] :
( app(X1,X2) != X0
| ~ ssList(X2) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( app(X1,X3) = X0
& ssList(X3) )
| ~ frontsegP(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f176]) ).
fof(f176,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( ( frontsegP(X0,X1)
| ! [X2] :
( app(X1,X2) != X0
| ~ ssList(X2) ) )
& ( ? [X2] :
( app(X1,X2) = X0
& ssList(X2) )
| ~ frontsegP(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( frontsegP(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X2] :
( app(X1,X2) = X0
& ssList(X2) ) )
| ~ ssList(X1) )
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ( frontsegP(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X2] :
( app(X1,X2) = X0
& ssList(X2) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hs7xOayPd8/Vampire---4.8_7395',ax5) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWC351+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 20:34:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hs7xOayPd8/Vampire---4.8_7395
% 0.55/0.74 % (7511)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7504)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7506)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7508)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7505)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7509)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7507)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.74 % (7510)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-7503"
% 0.55/0.75 % (7506)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.55/0.75 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Memory used [KB]: 1187
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (7509)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (7503)Success in time 0.382 s
% 0.55/0.75 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------