TSTP Solution File: SWC349-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC349-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.18s 1.39s
% Output : Refutation 1.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWC349-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:19:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43 The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43 Sun Jun 12 09:19:12 2022
% 0.19/0.43 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 31674.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43 136 back subsumes 135.
% 0.19/0.43 146 back subsumes 140.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 429 during input processing: 0 [copy,429,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 333.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 277.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 276.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 275.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 265.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 252.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 251.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 250.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 213.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 201.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 200.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 199.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 198.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 181.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 176.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 172.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 169.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 143.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 142.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 134.
% 0.19/0.43 429 back subsumes 133.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.38/0.63 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.38/0.63 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.38/0.63 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.38/0.63 number of clauses initially in problem: 396
% 0.38/0.63 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.38/0.63 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.38/0.63 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.38/0.63 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.38/0.63 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.38/0.63 distinct function count: 46
% 0.38/0.63 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.63
% 0.38/0.63 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.18/1.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.18/1.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.00 sec ----> 821 [binary,820.1,430.1] {+} $F.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.18/1.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.18/1.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 8 [] {+} -ssList(A)|frontsegP(A,nil).
% 1.18/1.39 131 [] {-} -frontsegP(sk2,sk1).
% 1.18/1.39 416 [] {-} ssList(sk2).
% 1.18/1.39 419 [] {-} nil=sk3.
% 1.18/1.39 421,420 [copy,419,flip.1] {-} sk3=nil.
% 1.18/1.39 425 [] {-} sk1=sk3.
% 1.18/1.39 427,426 [copy,425,demod,421] {-} sk1=nil.
% 1.18/1.39 430 [back_demod,131,demod,427] {-} -frontsegP(sk2,nil).
% 1.18/1.39 820 [hyper,416,8] {-} frontsegP(sk2,nil).
% 1.18/1.39 821 [binary,820.1,430.1] {+} $F.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.18/1.39 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 ============ end of search ============
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 true clauses given 1 (11.1%)
% 1.18/1.39 false clauses given 8
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 FALSE TRUE
% 1.18/1.39 2 2 2
% 1.18/1.39 3 46 6
% 1.18/1.39 4 9 13
% 1.18/1.39 5 1 0
% 1.18/1.39 6 2 2
% 1.18/1.39 7 0 29
% 1.18/1.39 8 0 8
% 1.18/1.39 9 2 23
% 1.18/1.39 10 0 14
% 1.18/1.39 11 1 44
% 1.18/1.39 12 0 3
% 1.18/1.39 13 0 25
% 1.18/1.39 14 0 28
% 1.18/1.39 15 0 30
% 1.18/1.39 16 0 17
% 1.18/1.39 17 0 14
% 1.18/1.39 18 0 2
% 1.18/1.39 19 0 6
% 1.18/1.39 20 0 4
% 1.18/1.39 21 0 18
% 1.18/1.39 22 0 13
% 1.18/1.39 23 0 6
% 1.18/1.39 tot: 63 307 (83.0% true)
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Model 2 [ 1 -17 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.18/1.39
% 1.18/1.39 Process 31674 finished Sun Jun 12 09:19:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------