TSTP Solution File: SWC349+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SWC349+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:55:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.82s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWC349+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 18:58:39 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.82 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.19/0.82
% 0.19/0.82 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.82
% 0.19/0.82 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.82 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.19/0.82 fof(ax45, axiom, ![U]: (ssList(U) => frontsegP(U, nil))).
% 0.19/0.82 fof(co1, conjecture, ![U2]: (ssList(U2) => ![V]: (ssList(V) => ![W]: (ssList(W) => ![X]: (ssList(X) => (nil!=W | (V!=X | (U2!=W | (~neq(V, nil) | frontsegP(V, U2)))))))))).
% 0.19/0.82
% 0.19/0.82 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.19/0.82 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.19/0.82 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.19/0.82 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.19/0.82 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.19/0.82 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.19/0.82 variables of u and v.
% 0.19/0.82 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.19/0.82 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.19/0.82
% 0.19/0.82 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.19/0.82
% 0.19/0.82 Axiom 1 (co1): nil = w.
% 0.19/0.82 Axiom 2 (co1_1): u = w.
% 0.19/0.82 Axiom 3 (co1_5): ssList(v) = true2.
% 0.19/0.82 Axiom 4 (ax45): fresh57(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.19/0.83 Axiom 5 (ax45): fresh57(ssList(X), true2, X) = frontsegP(X, nil).
% 0.19/0.83
% 0.19/0.83 Goal 1 (co1_8): frontsegP(v, u) = true2.
% 0.19/0.83 Proof:
% 0.19/0.83 frontsegP(v, u)
% 0.19/0.83 = { by axiom 2 (co1_1) }
% 0.19/0.83 frontsegP(v, w)
% 0.19/0.83 = { by axiom 1 (co1) R->L }
% 0.19/0.83 frontsegP(v, nil)
% 0.19/0.83 = { by axiom 5 (ax45) R->L }
% 0.19/0.83 fresh57(ssList(v), true2, v)
% 0.19/0.83 = { by axiom 3 (co1_5) }
% 0.19/0.83 fresh57(true2, true2, v)
% 0.19/0.83 = { by axiom 4 (ax45) }
% 0.19/0.83 true2
% 0.19/0.83 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.83
% 0.19/0.83 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------