TSTP Solution File: SWC349+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWC349+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:40:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 14 ~; 10 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( nil != X3
| X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| frontsegP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.16nhDjB93R/E---3.1_17225.p',co1) ).
fof(ax45,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> frontsegP(X1,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.16nhDjB93R/E---3.1_17225.p',ax45) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( nil != X3
| X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ neq(X2,nil)
| frontsegP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& nil = esk3_0
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& neq(esk2_0,nil)
& ~ frontsegP(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
nil = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ frontsegP(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X28] :
( ~ ssList(X28)
| frontsegP(X28,nil) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax45])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ frontsegP(esk2_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( frontsegP(X1,nil)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SWC349+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:39:52 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.16nhDjB93R/E---3.1_17225.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 17304 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 17307 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 69
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 49
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 70
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 15
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 123
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 46
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 333
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4308
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------