TSTP Solution File: SWC333-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWC333-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:58:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.54s 1.70s
% Output : Refutation 1.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 2 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
segmentP(sk4,sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(190,plain,
segmentP(sk2,sk1),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_7,co1_6,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
totalorderedP(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(192,plain,
totalorderedP(sk1),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_8,co1_6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(X)
| ~ neq(sk3,X)
| ~ segmentP(sk4,X)
| ~ segmentP(X,sk3)
| ~ totalorderedP(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(194,plain,
( ~ ssList(X)
| ~ neq(sk1,X)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,X)
| ~ segmentP(X,sk1)
| ~ totalorderedP(X) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_9,co1_5,co1_6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk5)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
| ~ totalorderedP(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
cnf(196,plain,
ssList(sk5),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_10,192,190]) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk1,sk5)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
| ~ totalorderedP(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(198,plain,
neq(sk1,sk5),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_11,192,190]) ).
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(sk2,sk5)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
| ~ totalorderedP(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(200,plain,
segmentP(sk2,sk5),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_12,192,190]) ).
cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
( segmentP(sk5,sk1)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
| ~ totalorderedP(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(202,plain,
segmentP(sk5,sk1),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_13,192,190]) ).
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
( totalorderedP(sk5)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
| ~ totalorderedP(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(204,plain,
totalorderedP(sk5),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_14,192,190]) ).
cnf(8795,plain,
$false,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[194,196,198,200,202,204]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWC333-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 14:15:54 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T14:15:54
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n005.cluster.edu at 2022-06-12T14:15:54
% 1.54/1.70
% 1.54/1.70
% 1.54/1.70 #||
% 1.54/1.70 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.70 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.54/1.70 ||#
% 1.54/1.70
% 1.54/1.70 ; Summary of computation:
% 1.54/1.70 ; 12501 formulas have been input or derived (from 137 formulas).
% 1.54/1.70 ; 8795 (70%) were retained. Of these,
% 1.54/1.70 ; 2605 (30%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.54/1.70 ; 6190 (70%) are still being kept.
% 1.54/1.70 ;
% 1.54/1.70 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.036 3% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.006 0% Assert (199 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.506 41% Process new row (12,483 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.235 19% Resolution (272 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.002 0% Paramodulation (136 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.011 1% Condensing (1,626 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.025 2% Forward subsumption (1,626 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.045 4% Backward subsumption (1,624 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.002 0% Clause clause subsumption (1,319 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.094 8% Forward simplification (12,483 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.181 15% Backward simplification (8,787 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.014 1% Ordering (4,178 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 0.070 6% Other
% 1.54/1.70 ; 1.229 Total
% 1.54/1.70 ; 1.230 Real time
% 1.54/1.70 ;
% 1.54/1.70 ; Term-hash-array has 14,566 terms in all.
% 1.54/1.70 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,579 entries (1,579 at peak, 1,624 added, 45 deleted).
% 1.54/1.70 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,473 nodes (1,473 at peak, 1,807 added, 334 deleted).
% 1.54/1.70 ; Retrieved 7,003 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,626 calls.
% 1.54/1.70 ; Retrieved 6,965 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,624 calls.
% 1.54/1.70 ; Path-index has 10,894 entries (10,894 at peak, 14,653 added, 3,759 deleted).
% 1.54/1.70 ; Path-index has 5,541 nodes (5,601 at peak, 6,093 added, 552 deleted).
% 1.54/1.70 ; Trie-index has 10,894 entries (10,894 at peak, 14,653 added, 3,759 deleted).
% 1.54/1.70 ; Trie-index has 28,602 nodes (28,605 at peak, 39,563 added, 10,961 deleted).
% 1.54/1.70 ; Retrieved 3,818 generalization terms in 28,166 calls.
% 1.54/1.70 ; Retrieved 7,249 instance terms in 7,162 calls.
% 1.54/1.70 ; Retrieved 662,892 unifiable terms in 14,199 calls.
% 1.54/1.70 ;
% 1.54/1.70 ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 1.54/1.70 ; 2 with value 4 3 with value 5
% 1.54/1.70 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 59 entries:
% 1.54/1.70 ; 2 with value 19 2 with value 24 7 with value 32
% 1.54/1.70 ; 12 with value 20 8 with value 25 1 with value 33
% 1.54/1.70 ; 9 with value 21 3 with value 26 1 with value 35
% 1.54/1.70 ; 5 with value 22 1 with value 27 2 with value 40
% 1.54/1.70 ; 2 with value 23 1 with value 29 3 with value 44
% 1.54/1.70 ; The agenda of rows to give has 5995 entries:
% 1.54/1.70 ; 41 with value (4 5) 734 with value (4 13) 138 with value (4 19)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 106 with value (4 7) 489 with value (4 14) 90 with value (4 20)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 186 with value (4 8) 1275 with value (4 15) 21 with value (4 21)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 277 with value (4 9) 159 with value (4 16) 21 with value (4 24)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 538 with value (4 10) 996 with value (4 17) 6 with value (4 25)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 354 with value (4 11) 408 with value (4 18) 6 with value (4 28)
% 1.54/1.70 ; 150 with value (4 12)
% 1.54/1.70 Evaluation took:
% 1.54/1.70 1.231 seconds of real time
% 1.54/1.70 1.132165 seconds of user run time
% 1.54/1.70 0.099104 seconds of system run time
% 1.54/1.70 [Run times include 0.15 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.54/1.70 0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.54/1.70 0 page faults and
% 1.54/1.70 97,401,184 bytes consed.
% 1.54/1.70 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.54/1.70 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T14:15:55
% 1.54/1.70 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.54/1.70 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------