TSTP Solution File: SWC328+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWC328+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:43:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 66 ( 21 ~; 18 |; 16 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 12 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f570,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f557,f567,f569]) ).
fof(f569,plain,
spl62_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f568]) ).
fof(f568,plain,
( $false
| spl62_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f552,f458]) ).
fof(f458,plain,
equalelemsP(sK26),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f342,f419]) ).
fof(f419,plain,
nil = sK26,
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f330,f332]) ).
fof(f332,plain,
sK28 = sK26,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
fof(f151,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
& ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( X0 = X2
& ssList(X3)
& nil = X2
& ( ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
| ~ equalelemsP(X0) )
& X1 = X3 )
& ssList(X2) ) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f150]) ).
fof(f150,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ( ~ segmentP(X1,X0)
| ~ equalelemsP(X0) )
& X0 = X2
& nil = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( equalelemsP(X0)
& segmentP(X1,X0) )
| X0 != X2
| nil != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( ( equalelemsP(X0)
& segmentP(X1,X0) )
| X0 != X2
| nil != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(f330,plain,
nil = sK28,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
fof(f342,plain,
equalelemsP(nil),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).
fof(f74,axiom,
equalelemsP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax74) ).
fof(f552,plain,
( ~ equalelemsP(sK26)
| spl62_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f550]) ).
fof(f550,plain,
( spl62_3
<=> equalelemsP(sK26) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl62_3])]) ).
fof(f567,plain,
spl62_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f566]) ).
fof(f566,plain,
( $false
| spl62_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f565,f454]) ).
fof(f454,plain,
ssList(sK27),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f331,f329]) ).
fof(f329,plain,
sK29 = sK27,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
fof(f331,plain,
ssList(sK29),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
fof(f565,plain,
( ~ ssList(sK27)
| spl62_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f445,f556]) ).
fof(f556,plain,
( ~ segmentP(sK27,sK26)
| spl62_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f554]) ).
fof(f554,plain,
( spl62_4
<=> segmentP(sK27,sK26) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl62_4])]) ).
fof(f445,plain,
! [X0] :
( segmentP(X0,sK26)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f307,f419]) ).
fof(f307,plain,
! [X0] :
( segmentP(X0,nil)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ ssList(X0)
| segmentP(X0,nil) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).
fof(f57,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> segmentP(X0,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax57) ).
fof(f557,plain,
( ~ spl62_3
| ~ spl62_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f328,f554,f550]) ).
fof(f328,plain,
( ~ segmentP(sK27,sK26)
| ~ equalelemsP(sK26) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SWC328+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 18:51:25 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.47 % (8053)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.16/0.48 % (8056)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.16/0.48 % (8048)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.16/0.48 % (8049)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.16/0.49 % (8057)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.16/0.49 % (8065)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.16/0.50
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50 % (8049)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50 % (8053)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.50 % (8069)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.16/0.50 % (8061)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.16/0.51 % (8064)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.16/0.51 TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.52 % (8054)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.16/0.52 TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.52 % (8056)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.52 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.52
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Time elapsed: 0.112 s
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.52 % (8053)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.52 % (8041)Success in time 0.191 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------