TSTP Solution File: SWC324-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC324-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.74s 0.98s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09 % Problem : SWC324-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 06:39:10 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Sun Jun 12 06:39:10 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18063.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.13/0.37 139 back subsumes 138.
% 0.13/0.37 149 back subsumes 143.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 429 during input processing: 0 [copy,429,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 337.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 281.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 280.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 279.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 269.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 256.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 255.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 254.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 216.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 204.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 203.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 202.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 201.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 184.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 181.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 179.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 175.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 172.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 149.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 148.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 147.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 146.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 145.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 137.
% 0.13/0.37 429 back subsumes 136.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.34/0.54 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.34/0.54 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.34/0.54 number of clauses in intial UL: 336
% 0.34/0.54 number of clauses initially in problem: 397
% 0.34/0.54 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.34/0.54 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.34/0.54 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.34/0.54 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.34/0.54 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.34/0.54 distinct function count: 46
% 0.34/0.54 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.34/0.54
% 0.34/0.54 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.98 cons(skac2,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac2,sk1),nil).
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.74/0.98 40 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1277.3 K.
% 0.74/0.98 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.74/0.98 sym_ent ( 304) 181 0 181 0 53.7 K
% 0.74/0.98 term ( 32) 82027 76358 5669 7 177.4 K
% 0.74/0.98 rel ( 40) 59516 53377 6139 3 239.9 K
% 0.74/0.98 term_ptr ( 16) 23934 2476 21458 51 336.1 K
% 0.74/0.98 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 fpa_head ( 24) 2155 67 2088 4 49.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 fpa_tree ( 56) 12900 12900 0 21 1.1 K
% 0.74/0.98 context (1288) 17682 17682 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.74/0.98 trail ( 24) 100222 100222 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.74/0.98 imd_tree ( 32) 68 16 52 7 1.8 K
% 0.74/0.98 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 is_tree ( 24) 1536 131 1405 33 33.7 K
% 0.74/0.98 is_pos (2424) 62846 62846 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.74/0.98 fsub_pos ( 16) 8722 8722 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 literal ( 32) 19266 15558 3708 0 115.9 K
% 0.74/0.98 clause ( 88) 3476 2544 932 0 80.1 K
% 0.74/0.98 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.74/0.98 clash_nd ( 80) 6847 6847 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.74/0.98 clause_ptr ( 16) 873 123 750 4 11.8 K
% 0.74/0.98 int_ptr ( 16) 7789 4144 3645 0 57.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.74/0.98 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 hints time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 conflict time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 new demod time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 post_process time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 back demod time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 back subsume 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 factor time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98 unindex time 0.00
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 true clauses given 1 (14.3%)
% 0.74/0.98 false clauses given 6
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 FALSE TRUE
% 0.74/0.98 2 1 4
% 0.74/0.98 3 38 6
% 0.74/0.98 4 12 3
% 0.74/0.98 5 0 1
% 0.74/0.98 6 2 1
% 0.74/0.98 7 0 23
% 0.74/0.98 9 2 17
% 0.74/0.98 10 0 2
% 0.74/0.98 11 0 35
% 0.74/0.98 12 3 15
% 0.74/0.98 13 0 24
% 0.74/0.98 14 0 6
% 0.74/0.98 15 0 21
% 0.74/0.98 16 0 11
% 0.74/0.98 17 0 11
% 0.74/0.98 18 0 1
% 0.74/0.98 19 0 5
% 0.74/0.98 21 0 15
% 0.74/0.98 22 0 9
% 0.74/0.98 23 0 5
% 0.74/0.98 tot: 58 215 (78.8% true)
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.74/0.98 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.74/0.98 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.74/0.98 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.74/0.98 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.74/0.98 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.74/0.98 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.74/0.98 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.74/0.98 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.74/0.98 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.74/0.98 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.74/0.98 All others: 571.
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.74/0.98
% 0.74/0.98 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------