TSTP Solution File: SWC320+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC320+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:01:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (   3 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  982 ( 161 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   40 (  15 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  541 ( 193   ~; 175   |; 146   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  569 ( 569 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   23 (  21 usr;  16 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (  64   !;  48   ?;  25   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_20,type,
    sQ10_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f287,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f229,f234,f239,f240,f245,f250,f255,f260,f261,f285]) ).

tff(f285,plain,
    ( ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_6
    | ~ spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f284]) ).

tff(f284,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_6
    | ~ spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f283,f254]) ).

tff(f254,plain,
    ( ssList(sK5)
    | ~ spl11_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f252]) ).

tff(f252,plain,
    ( spl11_7
  <=> ssList(sK5) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_7])]) ).

tff(f283,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK5)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_6
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f282,f259]) ).

tff(f259,plain,
    ( ssItem(sK4)
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f257]) ).

tff(f257,plain,
    ( spl11_8
  <=> ssItem(sK4) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_8])]) ).

tff(f282,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | ~ ssList(sK5)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f280,f249]) ).

tff(f249,plain,
    ( sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK2,app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5))
    | ~ spl11_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f247]) ).

tff(f247,plain,
    ( spl11_6
  <=> sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK2,app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_6])]) ).

tff(f280,plain,
    ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK2,app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5))
    | ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | ~ ssList(sK5)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f278,f244]) ).

tff(f244,plain,
    ( sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK3,app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil)))
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f242]) ).

tff(f242,plain,
    ( spl11_5
  <=> sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK3,app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil))) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_5])]) ).

tff(f278,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK3,app(X1,cons(X0,nil)))
        | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK2,app(cons(X0,nil),X1))
        | ~ ssItem(X0)
        | ~ ssList(X1) )
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f274,f218]) ).

tff(f218,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ10_eqProxy(X0,X2,X1)
      | ~ sQ10_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f189]) ).

tff(f189,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ10_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ10_eqProxy])]) ).

tff(f274,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK2,app(cons(X0,nil),X1))
        | ~ ssItem(X0)
        | ~ ssList(X1)
        | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(X1,cons(X0,nil)),sK3) )
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f218,f228]) ).

tff(f228,plain,
    ( ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
        ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(cons(X4,nil),X5),sK2)
        | ~ ssItem(X4)
        | ~ ssList(X5)
        | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(X5,cons(X4,nil)),sK3) )
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f227]) ).

tff(f227,plain,
    ( spl11_2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] :
        ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(X5,cons(X4,nil)),sK3)
        | ~ ssItem(X4)
        | ~ ssList(X5)
        | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(cons(X4,nil),X5),sK2) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_2])]) ).

tff(f261,plain,
    ( spl11_1
    | ~ spl11_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f196,f231,f223]) ).

tff(f223,plain,
    ( spl11_1
  <=> sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_1])]) ).

tff(f231,plain,
    ( spl11_3
  <=> sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_3])]) ).

tff(f196,plain,
    ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK3)
    | sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f143,f189]) ).

tff(f143,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK3 )
    | ( nil = sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f126,plain,
    ( ( ( ! [X4] :
            ( ! [X5] :
                ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
                | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                | ~ ssList(X5) )
            | ~ ssItem(X4) )
        & neq(sK1,nil) )
      | ( ( nil != sK0 )
        & ( nil = sK1 ) ) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
      | ( ( sK3 = app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil)) )
        & ( sK2 = app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5) )
        & ssList(sK5)
        & ssItem(sK4) ) )
    & ( ( nil != sK3 )
      | ( nil = sK2 ) )
    & ( sK0 = sK2 )
    & ( sK1 = sK3 )
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5])],[f99,f125,f124,f123,f122,f121,f120]) ).

tff(f120,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                            ( ! [X5] :
                                ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X1 )
                                | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X0 )
                                | ~ ssList(X5) )
                            | ~ ssItem(X4) )
                        & neq(X1,nil) )
                      | ( ( nil != X0 )
                        & ( nil = X1 ) ) )
                    & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      | ? [X6] :
                          ( ? [X7] :
                              ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                              & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X2 )
                              & ssList(X7) )
                          & ssItem(X6) ) )
                    & ( ( nil != X3 )
                      | ( nil = X2 ) )
                    & ( X0 = X2 )
                    & ( X1 = X3 )
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                          ( ! [X5] :
                              ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X1 )
                              | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                              | ~ ssList(X5) )
                          | ~ ssItem(X4) )
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ( nil != sK0 )
                      & ( nil = X1 ) ) )
                  & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ? [X6] :
                        ( ? [X7] :
                            ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                            & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X2 )
                            & ssList(X7) )
                        & ssItem(X6) ) )
                  & ( ( nil != X3 )
                    | ( nil = X2 ) )
                  & ( sK0 = X2 )
                  & ( X1 = X3 )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f121,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X1 )
                            | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                            | ~ ssList(X5) )
                        | ~ ssItem(X4) )
                    & neq(X1,nil) )
                  | ( ( nil != sK0 )
                    & ( nil = X1 ) ) )
                & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  | ? [X6] :
                      ( ? [X7] :
                          ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                          & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X2 )
                          & ssList(X7) )
                      & ssItem(X6) ) )
                & ( ( nil != X3 )
                  | ( nil = X2 ) )
                & ( sK0 = X2 )
                & ( X1 = X3 )
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
                          | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                          | ~ ssList(X5) )
                      | ~ ssItem(X4) )
                  & neq(sK1,nil) )
                | ( ( nil != sK0 )
                  & ( nil = sK1 ) ) )
              & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                | ? [X6] :
                    ( ? [X7] :
                        ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                        & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X2 )
                        & ssList(X7) )
                    & ssItem(X6) ) )
              & ( ( nil != X3 )
                | ( nil = X2 ) )
              & ( sK0 = X2 )
              & ( sK1 = X3 )
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f122,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                    ( ! [X5] :
                        ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
                        | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                        | ~ ssList(X5) )
                    | ~ ssItem(X4) )
                & neq(sK1,nil) )
              | ( ( nil != sK0 )
                & ( nil = sK1 ) ) )
            & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
              | ? [X6] :
                  ( ? [X7] :
                      ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                      & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X2 )
                      & ssList(X7) )
                  & ssItem(X6) ) )
            & ( ( nil != X3 )
              | ( nil = X2 ) )
            & ( sK0 = X2 )
            & ( sK1 = X3 )
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                  ( ! [X5] :
                      ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
                      | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                      | ~ ssList(X5) )
                  | ~ ssItem(X4) )
              & neq(sK1,nil) )
            | ( ( nil != sK0 )
              & ( nil = sK1 ) ) )
          & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
            | ? [X6] :
                ( ? [X7] :
                    ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                    & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = sK2 )
                    & ssList(X7) )
                & ssItem(X6) ) )
          & ( ( nil != X3 )
            | ( nil = sK2 ) )
          & ( sK0 = sK2 )
          & ( sK1 = X3 )
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f123,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                ( ! [X5] :
                    ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
                    | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                    | ~ ssList(X5) )
                | ~ ssItem(X4) )
            & neq(sK1,nil) )
          | ( ( nil != sK0 )
            & ( nil = sK1 ) ) )
        & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
          | ? [X6] :
              ( ? [X7] :
                  ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                  & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = sK2 )
                  & ssList(X7) )
              & ssItem(X6) ) )
        & ( ( nil != X3 )
          | ( nil = sK2 ) )
        & ( sK0 = sK2 )
        & ( sK1 = X3 )
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ( ! [X4] :
              ( ! [X5] :
                  ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
                  | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
                  | ~ ssList(X5) )
              | ~ ssItem(X4) )
          & neq(sK1,nil) )
        | ( ( nil != sK0 )
          & ( nil = sK1 ) ) )
      & ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
        | ? [X6] :
            ( ? [X7] :
                ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = sK3 )
                & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = sK2 )
                & ssList(X7) )
            & ssItem(X6) ) )
      & ( ( nil != sK3 )
        | ( nil = sK2 ) )
      & ( sK0 = sK2 )
      & ( sK1 = sK3 )
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f124,plain,
    ( ? [X6] :
        ( ? [X7] :
            ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = sK3 )
            & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = sK2 )
            & ssList(X7) )
        & ssItem(X6) )
   => ( ? [X7] :
          ( ( sK3 = app(X7,cons(sK4,nil)) )
          & ( sK2 = app(cons(sK4,nil),X7) )
          & ssList(X7) )
      & ssItem(sK4) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f125,plain,
    ( ? [X7] :
        ( ( sK3 = app(X7,cons(sK4,nil)) )
        & ( sK2 = app(cons(sK4,nil),X7) )
        & ssList(X7) )
   => ( ( sK3 = app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil)) )
      & ( sK2 = app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5) )
      & ssList(sK5) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                          ( ! [X5] :
                              ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X1 )
                              | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X0 )
                              | ~ ssList(X5) )
                          | ~ ssItem(X4) )
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ( nil != X0 )
                      & ( nil = X1 ) ) )
                  & ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ? [X6] :
                        ( ? [X7] :
                            ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X3 )
                            & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X2 )
                            & ssList(X7) )
                        & ssItem(X6) ) )
                  & ( ( nil != X3 )
                    | ( nil = X2 ) )
                  & ( X0 = X2 )
                  & ( X1 = X3 )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

tff(f98,plain,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ( ( ? [X4] :
                            ( ? [X5] :
                                ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X1 )
                                & ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) = X0 )
                                & ssList(X5) )
                            & ssItem(X4) )
                        | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                      & ( ( nil = X0 )
                        | ( nil != X1 ) ) )
                    | ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ! [X6] :
                          ( ssItem(X6)
                         => ! [X7] :
                              ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) != X3 )
                              | ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) != X2 )
                              | ~ ssList(X7) ) ) )
                    | ( ( nil = X3 )
                      & ( nil != X2 ) )
                    | ( X0 != X2 )
                    | ( X1 != X3 )
                    | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f97]) ).

tff(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ( ( ? [X6] :
                            ( ? [X7] :
                                ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X1 )
                                & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X0 )
                                & ssList(X7) )
                            & ssItem(X6) )
                        | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                      & ( ( nil = X0 )
                        | ( nil != X1 ) ) )
                    | ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ! [X4] :
                          ( ssItem(X4)
                         => ! [X5] :
                              ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3 )
                              | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X2 )
                              | ~ ssList(X5) ) ) )
                    | ( ( nil = X3 )
                      & ( nil != X2 ) )
                    | ( X0 != X2 )
                    | ( X1 != X3 )
                    | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

tff(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ? [X6] :
                          ( ? [X7] :
                              ( ( app(X7,cons(X6,nil)) = X1 )
                              & ( app(cons(X6,nil),X7) = X0 )
                              & ssList(X7) )
                          & ssItem(X6) )
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                    & ( ( nil = X0 )
                      | ( nil != X1 ) ) )
                  | ( neq(X3,nil)
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ssItem(X4)
                       => ! [X5] :
                            ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3 )
                            | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != X2 )
                            | ~ ssList(X5) ) ) )
                  | ( ( nil = X3 )
                    & ( nil != X2 ) )
                  | ( X0 != X2 )
                  | ( X1 != X3 )
                  | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwtzbaLUAs/Vampire---4.8_7814',co1) ).

tff(f260,plain,
    ( spl11_8
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f144,f236,f257]) ).

tff(f236,plain,
    ( spl11_4
  <=> neq(sK3,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_4])]) ).

tff(f144,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ssItem(sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f255,plain,
    ( spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f145,f236,f252]) ).

tff(f145,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ssList(sK5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f250,plain,
    ( spl11_6
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f195,f236,f247]) ).

tff(f195,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK2,app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5)) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f146,f189]) ).

tff(f146,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ( sK2 = app(cons(sK4,nil),sK5) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f245,plain,
    ( spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f194,f236,f242]) ).

tff(f194,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | sQ10_eqProxy($i,sK3,app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil))) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f147,f189]) ).

tff(f147,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ( sK3 = app(sK5,cons(sK4,nil)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f240,plain,
    ( spl11_3
    | spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f193,f236,f231]) ).

tff(f193,plain,
    ( neq(sK3,nil)
    | sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK3) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f182,f189]) ).

tff(f182,plain,
    ( neq(sK3,nil)
    | ( nil = sK3 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f148,f141,f141]) ).

tff(f141,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f148,plain,
    ( neq(sK1,nil)
    | ( nil = sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f239,plain,
    ( ~ spl11_1
    | spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f192,f236,f223]) ).

tff(f192,plain,
    ( neq(sK3,nil)
    | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f181,f189]) ).

tff(f181,plain,
    ( neq(sK3,nil)
    | ( nil != sK2 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f149,f141,f142]) ).

tff(f142,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f149,plain,
    ( neq(sK1,nil)
    | ( nil != sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f234,plain,
    ( spl11_3
    | spl11_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f191,f227,f231]) ).

tff(f191,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(X5,cons(X4,nil)),sK3)
      | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(cons(X4,nil),X5),sK2)
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK3) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f180,f189]) ).

tff(f180,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK3 )
      | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK2 )
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | ( nil = sK3 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f150,f141,f142,f141]) ).

tff(f150,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
      | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | ( nil = sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tff(f229,plain,
    ( ~ spl11_1
    | spl11_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f190,f227,f223]) ).

tff(f190,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(X5,cons(X4,nil)),sK3)
      | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,app(cons(X4,nil),X5),sK2)
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | ~ sQ10_eqProxy($i,nil,sK2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f179,f189]) ).

tff(f179,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK3 )
      | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK2 )
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | ( nil != sK2 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f151,f141,f142,f142]) ).

tff(f151,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != sK1 )
      | ( app(cons(X4,nil),X5) != sK0 )
      | ~ ssList(X5)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | ( nil != sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWC320+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:15:02 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.37  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IwtzbaLUAs/Vampire---4.8_7814
% 0.61/0.76  % (8074)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.76  % (8067)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.76  % (8069)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.76  % (8068)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.76  % (8070)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.76  % (8071)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.76  % (8072)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.77  % (8073)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.77  % (8069)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.77  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.77  
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)Memory used [KB]: 1171
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.77  % (8067)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.77  % (8063)Success in time 0.391 s
% 0.61/0.77  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------