TSTP Solution File: SWC319-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC319-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.97s 1.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC319-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 10:30:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.44 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.44 Sun Jun 12 10:30:56 2022
% 0.19/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22524.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.44 144 back subsumes 143.
% 0.19/0.44 154 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 443 during input processing: 0 [copy,443,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 349.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 291.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 290.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 289.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 279.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 266.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 265.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 264.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 221.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 209.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 208.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 207.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 206.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 189.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 186.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 184.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 180.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 177.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 154.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 153.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 152.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 151.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 150.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 142.
% 0.19/0.44 443 back subsumes 141.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.36/0.63 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.36/0.63 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.36/0.63 number of clauses in intial UL: 345
% 0.36/0.63 number of clauses initially in problem: 407
% 0.36/0.63 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.36/0.63 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.36/0.63 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.36/0.63 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.36/0.63 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.36/0.63 distinct function count: 46
% 0.36/0.63 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.36/0.63
% 0.36/0.63 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.20 cons(skac2,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac2,sk1),nil).
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.97/1.20 42 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1341.2 K.
% 0.97/1.20 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.97/1.20 sym_ent ( 304) 183 0 183 0 54.3 K
% 0.97/1.20 term ( 32) 86376 80343 6033 7 188.8 K
% 0.97/1.20 rel ( 40) 62541 55894 6647 3 259.8 K
% 0.97/1.20 term_ptr ( 16) 25656 2540 23116 51 362.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 fpa_head ( 24) 2170 63 2107 4 49.5 K
% 0.97/1.20 fpa_tree ( 56) 13646 13646 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.97/1.20 context (1288) 19005 19005 0 13 16.4 K
% 0.97/1.20 trail ( 24) 101302 101302 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.97/1.20 imd_tree ( 32) 68 16 52 7 1.8 K
% 0.97/1.20 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 is_tree ( 24) 1559 130 1429 33 34.3 K
% 0.97/1.20 is_pos (2424) 68660 68660 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.97/1.20 fsub_pos ( 16) 9515 9515 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 literal ( 32) 20427 16382 4045 0 126.4 K
% 0.97/1.20 clause ( 88) 3660 2669 991 0 85.2 K
% 0.97/1.20 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.97/1.20 clash_nd ( 80) 7459 7459 0 11 0.9 K
% 0.97/1.20 clause_ptr ( 16) 936 126 810 4 12.7 K
% 0.97/1.20 int_ptr ( 16) 8512 4382 4130 0 64.5 K
% 0.97/1.20 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.97/1.20 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 hints time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 conflict time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 new demod time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 post_process time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 back demod time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 back subsume 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 factor time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20 unindex time 0.00
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 true clauses given 1 (12.5%)
% 0.97/1.20 false clauses given 7
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 FALSE TRUE
% 0.97/1.20 2 1 3
% 0.97/1.20 3 40 4
% 0.97/1.20 4 9 6
% 0.97/1.20 5 1 0
% 0.97/1.20 6 2 2
% 0.97/1.20 7 0 29
% 0.97/1.20 9 1 22
% 0.97/1.20 10 0 2
% 0.97/1.20 11 0 44
% 0.97/1.20 12 3 18
% 0.97/1.20 13 0 29
% 0.97/1.20 14 0 8
% 0.97/1.20 15 0 25
% 0.97/1.20 16 0 14
% 0.97/1.20 17 0 13
% 0.97/1.20 18 0 1
% 0.97/1.20 19 0 6
% 0.97/1.20 21 0 18
% 0.97/1.20 22 0 11
% 0.97/1.20 23 0 6
% 0.97/1.20 tot: 57 261 (82.1% true)
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.97/1.20 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.97/1.20 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.97/1.20 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.97/1.20 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.97/1.20 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.97/1.20 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.97/1.20 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.97/1.20 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.97/1.20 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.97/1.20 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.97/1.20 All others: 614.
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.97/1.20
% 0.97/1.20 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------