TSTP Solution File: SWC309-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC309-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.02s 1.22s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWC309-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 22:26:38 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.44 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.44 The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.44 Sun Jun 12 22:26:38 2022
% 0.21/0.44 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 10248.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.44 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.44 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.44 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.44 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.44 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.44 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.21/0.44 139 back subsumes 138.
% 0.21/0.44 149 back subsumes 143.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.44 Following clause subsumed by 429 during input processing: 0 [copy,429,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 336.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 280.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 279.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 278.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 268.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 255.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 254.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 253.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 216.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 204.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 203.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 202.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 201.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 184.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 181.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 179.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 175.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 172.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 149.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 148.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 147.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 146.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 145.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 137.
% 0.21/0.44 429 back subsumes 136.
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.45/0.63 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.45/0.63 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.45/0.63 number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.45/0.63 number of clauses initially in problem: 397
% 0.45/0.63 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.45/0.63 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.45/0.63 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.45/0.63 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.45/0.63 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.45/0.63 distinct function count: 46
% 0.45/0.63 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.45/0.63
% 0.45/0.63 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.02/1.22 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.02/1.22 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.02/1.22 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 true clauses given 1 (16.7%)
% 1.02/1.22 false clauses given 5
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 FALSE TRUE
% 1.02/1.22 2 3 3
% 1.02/1.22 3 40 3
% 1.02/1.22 4 7 0
% 1.02/1.22 5 1 0
% 1.02/1.22 6 0 1
% 1.02/1.22 7 0 29
% 1.02/1.22 9 0 21
% 1.02/1.22 10 0 2
% 1.02/1.22 11 1 43
% 1.02/1.22 12 0 18
% 1.02/1.22 13 0 25
% 1.02/1.22 14 0 8
% 1.02/1.22 15 0 22
% 1.02/1.22 16 0 14
% 1.02/1.22 17 0 12
% 1.02/1.22 18 0 1
% 1.02/1.22 19 0 6
% 1.02/1.22 21 0 18
% 1.02/1.22 22 0 10
% 1.02/1.22 23 0 6
% 1.02/1.22 tot: 52 242 (82.3% true)
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Model 2 [ 1 1 3979 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.02/1.22 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.02/1.22 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.02/1.22 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 The job finished Sun Jun 12 22:26:39 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------