TSTP Solution File: SWC302-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC302-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.76s 0.97s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWC302-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 16:54:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43 Sun Jun 12 16:54:37 2022
% 0.19/0.43 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30813.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43 135 back subsumes 134.
% 0.19/0.43 145 back subsumes 139.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 436 during input processing: 0 [copy,436,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 332.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 276.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 275.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 274.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 264.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 251.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 250.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 249.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 212.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 200.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 199.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 198.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 197.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 180.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 177.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 175.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 171.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 168.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 143.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 142.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 141.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 133.
% 0.19/0.43 436 back subsumes 132.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.50 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.50 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.50 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.19/0.50 number of clauses initially in problem: 403
% 0.19/0.50 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.19/0.50 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.19/0.50 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.50 absolute distinct symbol count: 78
% 0.19/0.50 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.50 distinct function count: 46
% 0.19/0.50 distinct constant count: 12
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Model 2 [ 1 1 5205 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.97 cons(skac3,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac3,sk1),nil).
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.76/0.97 36 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1149.6 K.
% 0.76/0.97 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.76/0.97 sym_ent ( 304) 184 0 184 0 54.6 K
% 0.76/0.97 term ( 32) 78713 73612 5101 7 159.6 K
% 0.76/0.97 rel ( 40) 57684 52204 5480 3 214.2 K
% 0.76/0.97 term_ptr ( 16) 21593 1866 19727 64 309.2 K
% 0.76/0.97 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 fpa_head ( 24) 2192 37 2155 4 50.6 K
% 0.76/0.97 fpa_tree ( 56) 14160 14160 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.76/0.97 context (1288) 17567 17567 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.76/0.97 trail ( 24) 85554 85554 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.76/0.97 imd_tree ( 32) 105 20 85 9 2.9 K
% 0.76/0.97 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 is_tree ( 24) 1645 128 1517 40 36.5 K
% 0.76/0.97 is_pos (2424) 52772 52772 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.76/0.97 fsub_pos ( 16) 7201 7201 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 literal ( 32) 17822 14672 3150 0 98.4 K
% 0.76/0.97 clause ( 88) 3164 2319 845 0 72.6 K
% 0.76/0.97 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.76/0.97 clash_nd ( 80) 8039 8039 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.76/0.97 clause_ptr ( 16) 784 125 659 4 10.4 K
% 0.76/0.97 int_ptr ( 16) 6293 3781 2512 0 39.2 K
% 0.76/0.97 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.76/0.97 hints time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 conflict time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 new demod time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 post_process time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 back demod time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 back subsume 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 factor time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97 unindex time 0.00
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 true clauses given 1 (20.0%)
% 0.76/0.97 false clauses given 4
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.97 2 7 7
% 0.76/0.97 3 43 7
% 0.76/0.97 4 14 9
% 0.76/0.97 5 0 1
% 0.76/0.97 6 2 2
% 0.76/0.97 7 0 6
% 0.76/0.97 8 0 8
% 0.76/0.97 9 1 8
% 0.76/0.97 10 0 3
% 0.76/0.97 11 0 11
% 0.76/0.97 12 0 3
% 0.76/0.97 13 0 13
% 0.76/0.97 14 0 7
% 0.76/0.97 15 1 14
% 0.76/0.97 16 0 7
% 0.76/0.97 17 0 6
% 0.76/0.97 18 0 2
% 0.76/0.97 19 0 2
% 0.76/0.97 20 0 4
% 0.76/0.97 21 0 6
% 0.76/0.97 22 0 5
% 0.76/0.97 23 0 2
% 0.76/0.97 tot: 68 133 (66.2% true)
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Model 2 [ 1 -23 5205 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.76/0.97 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.76/0.97 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.76/0.97 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.76/0.97 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.76/0.97 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.76/0.97 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.76/0.97 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.76/0.97 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.76/0.97 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.76/0.97 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.76/0.97 All others: 483.
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.76/0.97
% 0.76/0.97 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------