TSTP Solution File: SWC292-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWC292-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:42:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 18 ~; 20 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 5 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f458,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f453,f262]) ).
fof(f262,plain,
~ strictorderedP(nil),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
strictorderedP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
fof(f453,plain,
strictorderedP(nil),
inference(superposition,[],[f245,f442]) ).
fof(f442,plain,
nil = sk3,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f433]) ).
fof(f433,plain,
( nil = sk3
| nil != nil ),
inference(superposition,[],[f193,f423]) ).
fof(f423,plain,
nil = sk4,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f422,f392]) ).
fof(f392,plain,
( ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f390,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f390,plain,
( nil = sk4
| ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssList(nil) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f349,f194]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
fof(f349,plain,
! [X7] :
( neq(sk4,X7)
| sk4 = X7
| ~ ssList(X7) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f100,f189]) ).
fof(f189,axiom,
ssList(sk4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_4) ).
fof(f100,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ ssList(X1)
| X0 = X1
| ~ ssList(X0)
| neq(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause100) ).
fof(f422,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f411,f245]) ).
fof(f411,plain,
( nil = sk4
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ strictorderedP(sk3) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f252,f393]) ).
fof(f393,plain,
( sk3 = cons(sk5,nil)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f388,f8]) ).
fof(f388,plain,
( ~ ssList(nil)
| sk3 = cons(sk5,nil)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f349,f195]) ).
fof(f195,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
fof(f252,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ strictorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X0) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f66,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ ssItem(X0)
| strictorderedP(cons(X0,nil)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause66) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
( nil != sk4
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f245,plain,
strictorderedP(sk3),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f197]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
~ strictorderedP(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
~ strictorderedP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SWC292-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 18:58:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 % (7457)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (7472)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7472)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (7464)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7481)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7465)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (7480)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Time elapsed: 0.105 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (7472)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (7452)Success in time 0.161 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------