TSTP Solution File: SWC292-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC292-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:03:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 1.48s
% Output   : Refutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : SWC292-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 18:54:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.26/1.48  
% 1.26/1.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.26/1.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.26/1.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.26/1.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.26/1.48  SPASS derived 1906 clauses, backtracked 1652 clauses, performed 52 splits and kept 3297 clauses.
% 1.26/1.48  SPASS allocated 77556 KBytes.
% 1.26/1.48  SPASS spent	0:00:01.11 on the problem.
% 1.26/1.48  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.26/1.48  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.26/1.48  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 1.26/1.48  		0:00:00.02 for the backtracking.
% 1.26/1.48  		0:00:00.87 for the reduction.
% 1.26/1.48  
% 1.26/1.48  
% 1.26/1.48  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 86 :
% 1.26/1.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.26/1.48  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(sk2)*.
% 1.26/1.48  5[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(sk4,sk2)**.
% 1.26/1.48  6[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(sk3,sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  7[0:Inp] || strictorderedP(sk1)* -> .
% 1.26/1.48  8[0:Inp] || equal(nil,sk4) -> equal(sk3,nil)**.
% 1.26/1.48  9[0:Inp] || neq(sk4,nil)* -> ssItem(sk5).
% 1.26/1.48  10[0:Inp] || neq(sk4,nil) -> equal(cons(sk5,nil),sk3)**.
% 1.26/1.48  12[0:Inp] ||  -> equalelemsP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  13[0:Inp] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  14[0:Inp] ||  -> strictorderedP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  15[0:Inp] ||  -> totalorderedP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  16[0:Inp] ||  -> strictorderP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  17[0:Inp] ||  -> totalorderP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  18[0:Inp] ||  -> cyclefreeP(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  19[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  77[0:Inp] ssItem(u) ||  -> strictorderedP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 1.26/1.48  83[0:Inp] ssList(u) ||  -> ssItem(v)* duplicatefreeP(u)*.
% 1.26/1.48  111[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) ||  -> equal(u,v) neq(u,v)*.
% 1.26/1.48  113[0:Inp] ssItem(u) ssItem(v) ||  -> equal(u,v) neq(u,v)*.
% 1.26/1.48  188[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(hd(v),hd(u))* equal(tl(v),tl(u)) -> equal(v,u) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 1.26/1.48  199[0:Rew:5.0,9.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> ssItem(sk5).
% 1.26/1.48  201[0:Rew:6.0,8.1,5.0,8.0] || equal(nil,sk2)** -> equal(nil,sk1).
% 1.26/1.48  202[0:Rew:6.0,10.1,5.0,10.0] || neq(sk2,nil) -> equal(cons(sk5,nil),sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  288[0:Res:2.0,83.0] ||  -> ssItem(u)* duplicatefreeP(sk2)*.
% 1.26/1.48  342[0:Res:2.0,111.1] ssList(u) ||  -> equal(sk2,u) neq(sk2,u)*.
% 1.26/1.48  459[0:Res:1.0,83.0] ||  -> ssItem(u)* duplicatefreeP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  474[0:Res:1.0,188.1] ssList(u) || equal(hd(u),hd(sk1))* equal(tl(u),tl(sk1)) -> equal(u,sk1) equal(nil,u) equal(nil,sk1).
% 1.26/1.48  561[1:Spt:83.1] ||  -> ssItem(u)*.
% 1.26/1.48  571[1:MRR:77.0,561.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 1.26/1.48  592[1:MRR:113.1,113.0,561.0] ||  -> equal(u,v) neq(u,v)*.
% 1.26/1.48  764[2:Spt:474.5] ||  -> equal(nil,sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  828[2:Rew:764.0,14.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  872[2:MRR:828.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  961[2:Spt:872.0,474.5,764.0] || equal(nil,sk1)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  962[2:Spt:872.0,474.0,474.1,474.2,474.3,474.4] ssList(u) || equal(hd(u),hd(sk1))* equal(tl(u),tl(sk1)) -> equal(u,sk1) equal(nil,u).
% 1.26/1.48  967[2:MRR:201.1,961.0] || equal(nil,sk2)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1069[1:SpR:202.1,571.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> strictorderedP(sk1).
% 1.26/1.48  1078[1:MRR:1069.1,7.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1080[1:Res:592.1,1078.0] ||  -> equal(nil,sk2)**.
% 1.26/1.48  1081[2:MRR:1080.0,967.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1082[1:Spt:1081.0,83.0,83.2] ssList(u) ||  -> duplicatefreeP(u)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1114[2:Spt:459.0] ||  -> ssItem(u)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1120[2:MRR:77.0,1114.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 1.26/1.48  1143[2:MRR:113.1,113.0,1114.0] ||  -> equal(u,v) neq(u,v)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1311[3:Spt:474.5] ||  -> equal(nil,sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  1314[3:Rew:1311.0,14.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1415[3:MRR:1314.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1510[3:Spt:1415.0,474.5,1311.0] || equal(nil,sk1)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1511[3:Spt:1415.0,474.0,474.1,474.2,474.3,474.4] ssList(u) || equal(hd(u),hd(sk1))* equal(tl(u),tl(sk1)) -> equal(u,sk1) equal(nil,u).
% 1.26/1.48  1516[3:MRR:201.1,1510.0] || equal(nil,sk2)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1620[2:SpR:202.1,1120.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> strictorderedP(sk1).
% 1.26/1.48  1627[2:MRR:1620.1,7.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1629[2:Res:1143.1,1627.0] ||  -> equal(nil,sk2)**.
% 1.26/1.48  1630[3:MRR:1629.0,1516.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  1631[2:Spt:1630.0,459.1] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1634[3:Spt:288.0] ||  -> ssItem(u)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1644[3:MRR:77.0,1634.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 1.26/1.48  1665[3:MRR:113.1,113.0,1634.0] ||  -> equal(u,v) neq(u,v)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1829[4:Spt:474.5] ||  -> equal(nil,sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  1835[4:Rew:1829.0,14.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  1937[4:MRR:1835.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2028[4:Spt:1937.0,474.5,1829.0] || equal(nil,sk1)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2029[4:Spt:1937.0,474.0,474.1,474.2,474.3,474.4] ssList(u) || equal(hd(u),hd(sk1))* equal(tl(u),tl(sk1)) -> equal(u,sk1) equal(nil,u).
% 1.26/1.48  2034[4:MRR:201.1,2028.0] || equal(nil,sk2)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2136[3:SpR:202.1,1644.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> strictorderedP(sk1).
% 1.26/1.48  2145[3:MRR:2136.1,7.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2147[3:Res:1665.1,2145.0] ||  -> equal(nil,sk2)**.
% 1.26/1.48  2148[4:MRR:2147.0,2034.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2149[3:Spt:2148.0,288.1] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(sk2)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2150[4:Spt:474.5] ||  -> equal(nil,sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  2153[4:Rew:2150.0,14.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2257[4:MRR:2153.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2350[4:Spt:2257.0,474.5,2150.0] || equal(nil,sk1)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2351[4:Spt:2257.0,474.0,474.1,474.2,474.3,474.4] ssList(u) || equal(hd(u),hd(sk1))* equal(tl(u),tl(sk1)) -> equal(u,sk1) equal(nil,u).
% 1.26/1.48  2357[4:MRR:201.1,2350.0] || equal(nil,sk2)** -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2408[5:Spt:199.0] || neq(sk2,nil)* -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2471[5:Res:342.2,2408.0] ssList(nil) ||  -> equal(nil,sk2)**.
% 1.26/1.48  2472[5:SSi:2471.0,19.0,18.0,17.0,16.0,15.0,14.0,13.0,12.0] ||  -> equal(nil,sk2)**.
% 1.26/1.48  2473[5:MRR:2472.0,2357.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  2474[5:Spt:2473.0,199.0,2408.0] ||  -> neq(sk2,nil)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2475[5:Spt:2473.0,199.1] ||  -> ssItem(sk5)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2477[5:MRR:202.0,2474.0] ||  -> equal(cons(sk5,nil),sk1)**.
% 1.26/1.48  2482[5:SpR:2477.0,77.1] ssItem(sk5) ||  -> strictorderedP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2486[5:SSi:2482.0,2475.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(sk1)*.
% 1.26/1.48  2487[5:MRR:2486.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 1.26/1.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.26/1.48  Formulae used in the proof : co1_1 co1_2 co1_5 co1_6 co1_7 co1_8 co1_9 co1_10 clause1 clause2 clause3 clause4 clause5 clause6 clause7 clause8 clause66 clause72 clause100 clause102 clause177
% 1.26/1.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------