TSTP Solution File: SWC291+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC291+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:27:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 16 ~; 14 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 20 ( 9 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 9 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ strictorderedP(X3)
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X3,X5)
& segmentP(X4,X5)
& segmentP(X5,X3)
& strictorderedP(X5) )
| strictorderedP(X1) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
| ~ strictorderedP(X3)
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X3,X5)
& segmentP(X4,X5)
& segmentP(X5,X3)
& strictorderedP(X5) )
| strictorderedP(X1) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X10] :
( ssList(esk1_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk4_0)
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& segmentP(esk4_0,esk3_0)
& strictorderedP(esk3_0)
& ( ~ ssList(X10)
| ~ neq(esk3_0,X10)
| ~ segmentP(esk4_0,X10)
| ~ segmentP(X10,esk3_0)
| ~ strictorderedP(X10) )
& ~ strictorderedP(esk1_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
strictorderedP(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ strictorderedP(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC291+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 21:29:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 47
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 86
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 284
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6555
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2964 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------