TSTP Solution File: SWC288-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWC288-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:28:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 10 unt; 4 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 9 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
~ strictorderedP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(clause66,axiom,
( strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause66) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(clause3,axiom,
strictorderedP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause3) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ strictorderedP(sk1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause66]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ strictorderedP(sk1),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_18 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ strictorderedP(sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk3 ),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
sk3 = nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
strictorderedP(nil),
clause3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWC288-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 03:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 16272 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 16275 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 206
% 0.20/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 131
% 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses : 75
% 0.20/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 0.20/0.52 # Processed clauses : 115
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.20/0.52 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.20/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 107
% 0.20/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 0.20/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.20/0.52 # Generated clauses : 16
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.20/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.20/0.52 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.20/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.20/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 25
% 0.20/0.52 # ...of those cached : 18
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.20/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
% 0.20/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 188
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 79
% 0.20/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 722
% 0.20/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
% 0.20/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.20/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.20/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4641
% 0.20/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 859
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2096 pages
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.52 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.20/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1880 pages
% 0.20/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------