TSTP Solution File: SWC286+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC286+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:03:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.84s 1.08s
% Output   : Refutation 0.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWC286+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:14:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.84/1.08  
% 0.84/1.08  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.84/1.08  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.84/1.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.84/1.08  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.84/1.08  SPASS derived 997 clauses, backtracked 641 clauses, performed 23 splits and kept 1490 clauses.
% 0.84/1.08  SPASS allocated 98942 KBytes.
% 0.84/1.08  SPASS spent	0:00:00.73 on the problem.
% 0.84/1.08  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.84/1.08  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.84/1.08  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.84/1.08  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.84/1.08  		0:00:00.41 for the reduction.
% 0.84/1.08  
% 0.84/1.08  
% 0.84/1.08  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 50 :
% 0.84/1.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.84/1.08  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc4)*.
% 0.84/1.08  6[0:Inp] ||  -> cyclefreeP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  7[0:Inp] ||  -> totalorderP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  8[0:Inp] ||  -> strictorderP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  9[0:Inp] ||  -> totalorderedP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  10[0:Inp] ||  -> strictorderedP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  11[0:Inp] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  12[0:Inp] ||  -> equalelemsP(nil)*.
% 0.84/1.08  13[0:Inp] || strictorderedP(skc4)* -> .
% 0.84/1.08  52[0:Inp] ||  -> ssItem(skf44(u,v))*.
% 0.84/1.08  68[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(nil,skc5).
% 0.84/1.08  69[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.84/1.08  70[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(nil,u)* -> .
% 0.84/1.08  75[0:Inp] ssItem(u) ||  -> strictorderedP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 0.84/1.08  79[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v) memberP(u,skf44(u,v))*.
% 0.84/1.08  86[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v) equal(cons(skf44(u,v),nil),v)**.
% 0.84/1.08  187[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(tl(u),tl(v))* equal(hd(u),hd(v)) -> equal(u,v) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 0.84/1.08  196[0:Rew:69.1,68.1] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(skc5,skc4).
% 0.84/1.08  285[0:Res:2.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u) equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.84/1.08  456[0:Res:1.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u) equal(nil,skc5).
% 0.84/1.08  559[1:Spt:456.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc5)**.
% 0.84/1.08  631[1:Rew:559.0,12.0] ||  -> equalelemsP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  632[1:Rew:559.0,11.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  633[1:Rew:559.0,10.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  634[1:Rew:559.0,9.0] ||  -> totalorderedP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  635[1:Rew:559.0,8.0] ||  -> strictorderP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  636[1:Rew:559.0,7.0] ||  -> totalorderP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  637[1:Rew:559.0,6.0] ||  -> cyclefreeP(skc5)*.
% 0.84/1.08  653[1:Rew:559.0,70.1] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc5,u)* -> .
% 0.84/1.08  759[2:Spt:196.1] ||  -> equal(skc5,skc4)**.
% 0.84/1.08  862[2:Rew:759.0,633.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(skc4)*.
% 0.84/1.08  911[2:MRR:862.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1009[2:Spt:911.0,196.1,759.0] || equal(skc5,skc4)** -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1010[2:Spt:911.0,196.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1057[1:Res:79.1,653.1] ssItem(skf44(skc5,u)) ||  -> SkP0(skc5,u)*.
% 0.84/1.08  1058[1:SSi:1057.0,52.0,637.0,636.0,635.0,634.0,633.0,632.0,631.0,1.0] ||  -> SkP0(skc5,u)*.
% 0.84/1.08  1059[2:UnC:1058.0,1010.0] ||  -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1060[1:Spt:1059.0,456.5,559.0] || equal(nil,skc5)** -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1061[1:Spt:1059.0,456.0,456.1,456.2,456.3,456.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.84/1.08  1076[2:Spt:285.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc4)**.
% 0.84/1.08  1083[2:Rew:1076.0,10.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(skc4)*.
% 0.84/1.08  1169[2:MRR:1083.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1248[2:Spt:1169.0,285.5,1076.0] || equal(nil,skc4)** -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1249[2:Spt:1169.0,285.0,285.1,285.2,285.3,285.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u).
% 0.84/1.08  1255[2:MRR:69.1,1248.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.84/1.08  1375[0:SpR:86.1,75.1] ssItem(skf44(u,v)) ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* strictorderedP(v).
% 0.84/1.08  1384[0:SSi:1375.0,52.0] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* strictorderedP(v).
% 0.84/1.08  1393[2:Res:1384.0,1255.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(skc4)*.
% 0.84/1.08  1394[2:MRR:1393.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.84/1.08  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.84/1.08  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax2 ax60 ax62 ax64 ax66 ax69 ax72 ax74 ax38 ax68 ax77
% 0.84/1.08  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------