TSTP Solution File: SWC281-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC281-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.74s 0.93s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWC281-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:46:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.45 The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.45 Sun Jun 12 09:46:07 2022
% 0.19/0.45 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 17601.
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.45 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.45 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.45 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.45 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.45 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.45 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.45 141 back subsumes 140.
% 0.19/0.45 151 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.45 Following clause subsumed by 446 during input processing: 0 [copy,446,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 341.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 284.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 283.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 282.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 272.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 259.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 258.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 257.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 218.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 206.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 205.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 203.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 186.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 183.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 181.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 177.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 174.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 151.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 150.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 149.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 147.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 139.
% 0.19/0.45 446 back subsumes 138.
% 0.19/0.45
% 0.19/0.45 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.50 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.50 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.50 number of clauses in intial UL: 337
% 0.19/0.50 number of clauses initially in problem: 412
% 0.19/0.50 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.19/0.50 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.19/0.50 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.50 absolute distinct symbol count: 78
% 0.19/0.50 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.50 distinct function count: 46
% 0.19/0.50 distinct constant count: 12
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.70/0.92 app(app(sk1,nil),sk1)=app(sk1,app(nil,sk1)).
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.70/0.92 37 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1181.5 K.
% 0.70/0.92 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.70/0.92 sym_ent ( 304) 188 0 188 0 55.8 K
% 0.70/0.92 term ( 32) 76407 71028 5379 10 168.4 K
% 0.70/0.92 rel ( 40) 55209 49466 5743 8 224.6 K
% 0.70/0.92 term_ptr ( 16) 22617 2387 20230 59 317.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 fpa_head ( 24) 2072 56 2016 5 47.4 K
% 0.70/0.92 fpa_tree ( 56) 10329 10329 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.70/0.92 context (1288) 15129 15129 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.70/0.92 trail ( 24) 97839 97839 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.70/0.92 imd_tree ( 32) 35 12 23 8 1.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 is_tree ( 24) 1423 119 1304 31 31.3 K
% 0.70/0.92 is_pos (2424) 60161 60161 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.70/0.92 fsub_pos ( 16) 7806 7806 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 literal ( 32) 17928 14460 3468 1 108.4 K
% 0.70/0.92 clause ( 88) 3234 2366 868 1 74.7 K
% 0.70/0.92 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.70/0.92 clash_nd ( 80) 5261 5261 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.70/0.92 clause_ptr ( 16) 773 99 674 6 10.6 K
% 0.70/0.92 int_ptr ( 16) 6597 3612 2985 6 46.7 K
% 0.70/0.92 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.93 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.70/0.93 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 conflict time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 new demod time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 post_process time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 back demod time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 back subsume 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 factor time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93 unindex time 0.00
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 true clauses given 1 (20.0%)
% 0.70/0.93 false clauses given 4
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 FALSE TRUE
% 0.70/0.93 2 5 8
% 0.70/0.93 3 36 6
% 0.70/0.93 4 7 0
% 0.70/0.93 5 2 0
% 0.70/0.93 6 1 1
% 0.70/0.93 7 0 18
% 0.70/0.93 9 1 13
% 0.70/0.93 10 0 1
% 0.70/0.93 11 1 27
% 0.70/0.93 12 3 12
% 0.70/0.93 13 0 15
% 0.70/0.93 14 0 5
% 0.70/0.93 15 0 14
% 0.70/0.93 16 0 9
% 0.70/0.93 17 0 8
% 0.70/0.93 19 0 4
% 0.70/0.93 21 0 13
% 0.70/0.93 22 0 6
% 0.70/0.93 23 0 6
% 0.70/0.93 25 0 1
% 0.70/0.93 tot: 56 167 (74.9% true)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.70/0.93 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.70/0.93 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.70/0.93 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.70/0.93 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.70/0.93 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.70/0.93 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.70/0.93 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.70/0.93 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.70/0.93 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.70/0.93 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.70/0.93 All others: 511.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------