TSTP Solution File: SWC279-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC279-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:40:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  125 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  156 (  75   ~;  77   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f259,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f220,f225,f230,f231,f249,f258]) ).

fof(f258,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f257]) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f256,f224]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sk8,sk5)
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> leq(sk8,sk5) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

fof(f256,plain,
    ( leq(sk8,sk5)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f255,f198]) ).

fof(f198,axiom,
    ssItem(sk8),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).

fof(f255,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sk8)
    | leq(sk8,sk5)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f254,f215]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    ( memberP(sk6,sk8)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> memberP(sk6,sk8) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f254,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ memberP(sk6,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | leq(X0,sk5) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f253,f194]) ).

fof(f194,axiom,
    ssItem(sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

fof(f253,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | leq(X0,sk5)
      | ~ memberP(sk6,X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f252,f196]) ).

fof(f196,axiom,
    ssList(sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

fof(f252,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(sk7)
      | ~ memberP(sk6,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | leq(X0,sk5) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f251,f195]) ).

fof(f195,axiom,
    ssList(sk6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

fof(f251,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(sk6)
      | ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | leq(X0,sk5)
      | ~ memberP(sk6,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ ssList(sk7) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f250]) ).

fof(f250,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | leq(X0,sk5)
      | ~ ssList(sk6)
      | ~ memberP(sk6,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ ssList(sk7)
      | sk3 != sk3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f193,f203]) ).

fof(f203,plain,
    sk3 = app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f197,f191]) ).

fof(f191,axiom,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

fof(f197,axiom,
    sk1 = app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).

fof(f193,axiom,
    ! [X8,X6,X9,X7] :
      ( sk3 != app(app(X7,cons(X6,nil)),X8)
      | leq(X9,X6)
      | ~ ssItem(X6)
      | ~ ssItem(X9)
      | ~ ssList(X8)
      | ~ memberP(X7,X9)
      | ~ ssList(X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f248]) ).

fof(f248,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f247,f198]) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sk8)
    | ~ spl0_2
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f246,f229]) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sk5,sk8)
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f227]) ).

fof(f227,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> leq(sk5,sk8) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    ( leq(sk5,sk8)
    | ~ ssItem(sk8)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f245,f219]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ( memberP(sk7,sk8)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f217]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> memberP(sk7,sk8) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ memberP(sk7,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | leq(sk5,X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f244,f195]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ memberP(sk7,X0)
      | leq(sk5,X0)
      | ~ ssList(sk6) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f243,f194]) ).

fof(f243,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ ssList(sk6)
      | ~ memberP(sk7,X0)
      | leq(sk5,X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f242,f196]) ).

fof(f242,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( leq(sk5,X0)
      | ~ ssList(sk7)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | ~ ssList(sk6)
      | ~ memberP(sk7,X0) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f241]) ).

fof(f241,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sk3 != sk3
      | ~ ssItem(sk5)
      | leq(sk5,X0)
      | ~ ssList(sk6)
      | ~ ssList(sk7)
      | ~ ssItem(X0)
      | ~ memberP(sk7,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f192,f203]) ).

fof(f192,axiom,
    ! [X8,X6,X9,X7] :
      ( sk3 != app(app(X7,cons(X6,nil)),X8)
      | ~ ssList(X7)
      | ~ ssItem(X6)
      | ~ ssList(X8)
      | ~ memberP(X8,X9)
      | leq(X6,X9)
      | ~ ssItem(X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f200,f227,f213]) ).

fof(f200,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(sk5,sk8)
    | memberP(sk6,sk8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f202,f222,f227]) ).

fof(f202,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(sk8,sk5)
    | ~ leq(sk5,sk8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f201,f222,f217]) ).

fof(f201,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(sk8,sk5)
    | memberP(sk7,sk8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

fof(f220,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f199,f217,f213]) ).

fof(f199,axiom,
    ( memberP(sk7,sk8)
    | memberP(sk6,sk8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWC279-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:35:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  % (513)dis+21_1:1_av=off:fd=off:lcm=predicate:sos=on:spb=goal:urr=ec_only:i=42:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/42Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56  % (528)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56  % (536)dis+10_1:1_add=large:alpa=false:anc=none:fd=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=2:sgt=20:ss=included:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (515)lrs+10_1:1_bd=off:drc=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=1:sgt=16:spb=goal_then_units:ss=axioms:to=lpo:i=43:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/43Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (521)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (525)lrs+30_1:12_av=off:bs=unit_only:fsd=on:gs=on:lwlo=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:slsqr=1,2:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (536)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.57  % (525)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.57  % (525)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (525)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.57  % (517)dis+1011_1:16_fsr=off:nwc=2.0:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.21/0.58  
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58  % (525)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59  % (533)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=67:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/67Mi)
% 0.21/0.59  % (512)lrs+10_1:1_kws=precedence:lwlo=on:tgt=ground:i=99966:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99966Mi)
% 0.21/0.59  % (517)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.59  % (534)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.60  
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Time elapsed: 0.171 s
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60  % (536)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60  % (511)Success in time 0.239 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------