TSTP Solution File: SWC275+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SWC275+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:42:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.78s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  239 (  93 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  273 (  84   ~;  76   |;  97   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn;  21   !;  30   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

fof(f65,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssItem(X0)
     => totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax65) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax66) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                        | cons(X4,nil) != X2
                        | ~ ssItem(X4) ) )
                  | ( nil = X3
                    & nil != X2 )
                  | totalorderedP(X0)
                  | X0 != X2
                  | X1 != X3
                  | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                      & ! [X4] :
                          ( ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                          | cons(X4,nil) != X2
                          | ~ ssItem(X4) ) )
                    | ( nil = X3
                      & nil != X2 )
                    | totalorderedP(X0)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f315,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f342,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      | ? [X4] :
                          ( memberP(X3,X4)
                          & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                          & ssItem(X4) ) )
                    & ( nil != X3
                      | nil = X2 )
                    & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ( nil != X3
                    | nil = X2 )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
                  & sK53 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK53) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  | ? [X4] :
                      ( memberP(X3,X4)
                      & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                      & ssItem(X4) ) )
                & ( nil != X3
                  | nil = X2 )
                & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
                & sK53 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                | ? [X4] :
                    ( memberP(X3,X4)
                    & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                    & ssItem(X4) ) )
              & ( nil != X3
                | nil = X2 )
              & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
              & sK53 = X2
              & sK54 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK54) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
              | ? [X4] :
                  ( memberP(X3,X4)
                  & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                  & ssItem(X4) ) )
            & ( nil != X3
              | nil = X2 )
            & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
            & sK53 = X2
            & sK54 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
            | ? [X4] :
                ( memberP(X3,X4)
                & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
                & ssItem(X4) ) )
          & ( nil != X3
            | nil = sK55 )
          & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
          & sK53 = sK55
          & sK54 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK55) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f345,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
          | ? [X4] :
              ( memberP(X3,X4)
              & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
              & ssItem(X4) ) )
        & ( nil != X3
          | nil = sK55 )
        & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
        & sK53 = sK55
        & sK54 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
        | ? [X4] :
            ( memberP(sK56,X4)
            & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
            & ssItem(X4) ) )
      & ( nil != sK56
        | nil = sK55 )
      & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
      & sK53 = sK55
      & sK54 = sK56
      & ssList(sK56) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ( ? [X4] :
        ( memberP(sK56,X4)
        & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
        & ssItem(X4) )
   => ( memberP(sK56,sK57)
      & sK55 = cons(sK57,nil)
      & ssItem(sK57) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ( ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
      | ( memberP(sK56,sK57)
        & sK55 = cons(sK57,nil)
        & ssItem(sK57) ) )
    & ( nil != sK56
      | nil = sK55 )
    & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK53) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56,sK57])],[f221,f346,f345,f344,f343,f342]) ).

fof(f438,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f315]) ).

fof(f440,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f502,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f180]) ).

fof(f503,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f548,plain,
    ssList(sK54),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f551,plain,
    sK54 = sK56,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f552,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f553,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK53),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f554,plain,
    ( nil != sK56
    | nil = sK55 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f555,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f556,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | sK55 = cons(sK57,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f558,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK55),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f553,f552]) ).

fof(f559,plain,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f548,f551]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X0 = X1
    | neq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f438]) ).

cnf(c_141,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f440]) ).

cnf(c_203,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X0)
    | totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f502]) ).

cnf(c_204,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f503]) ).

cnf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | cons(sK57,nil) = sK55 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f556]) ).

cnf(c_248,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK56,nil)
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f555]) ).

cnf(c_249,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sK56
    | nil = sK55 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f554]) ).

cnf(c_250,negated_conjecture,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK55),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f558]) ).

cnf(c_253,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK56),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f559]) ).

cnf(c_3228,plain,
    ( X0 != sK56
    | X1 != nil
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X0 = X1
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_248]) ).

cnf(c_3229,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK56)
    | sK56 = nil
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3228]) ).

cnf(c_3230,plain,
    ( sK56 = nil
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3229,c_253,c_141,c_3229]) ).

cnf(c_3238,plain,
    ( X0 != sK56
    | X1 != nil
    | ~ ssList(X0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | cons(sK57,nil) = sK55
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_247]) ).

cnf(c_3239,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK56)
    | cons(sK57,nil) = sK55
    | sK56 = nil ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3238]) ).

cnf(c_3240,plain,
    ( cons(sK57,nil) = sK55
    | sK56 = nil ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3239,c_253,c_141,c_3239]) ).

cnf(c_11958,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK57)
    | nil = sK56
    | totalorderedP(sK55) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3240,c_203]) ).

cnf(c_11959,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK57)
    | nil = sK56 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11958,c_250]) ).

cnf(c_11966,plain,
    nil = sK56,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3230,c_11959]) ).

cnf(c_11967,plain,
    nil = sK55,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_249,c_11966]) ).

cnf(c_11972,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_11967]) ).

cnf(c_11974,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11972,c_204]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWC275+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 15:56:05 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.78/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.78/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.78/1.17  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.78/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.78/1.17  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  clauses                                 187
% 0.78/1.17  conjectures                             4
% 0.78/1.17  EPR                                     55
% 0.78/1.17  Horn                                    116
% 0.78/1.17  unary                                   19
% 0.78/1.17  binary                                  44
% 0.78/1.17  lits                                    629
% 0.78/1.17  lits eq                                 84
% 0.78/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 0.78/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 0.78/1.17  fd_cond                                 21
% 0.78/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          14
% 0.78/1.17  AC symbols                              0
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ 
% 0.78/1.17  Current options:
% 0.78/1.17  ------ 
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.78/1.17  
% 0.78/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.78/1.18  
% 0.78/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------