TSTP Solution File: SWC275+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWC275+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:14:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.48s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  17 unt;   4 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (  17 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_200,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_200) ).

cnf(i_0_197,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).

cnf(i_0_192,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_192) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
    ~ totalorderedP(esk48_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).

cnf(i_0_196,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_196) ).

cnf(i_0_193,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk52_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_193) ).

cnf(i_0_121,plain,
    ( totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_121) ).

cnf(i_0_194,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk50_0 = nil
    | nil != esk51_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_194) ).

cnf(i_0_122,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-95_fhswk/lgb.p',i_0_122) ).

cnf(c_0_212,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    i_0_200 ).

cnf(c_0_213,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    i_0_197 ).

cnf(c_0_214,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    i_0_192 ).

cnf(c_0_215,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_216,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_217,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk51_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_212,c_0_213]) ).

cnf(c_0_218,negated_conjecture,
    ~ totalorderedP(esk48_0),
    i_0_195 ).

cnf(c_0_219,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = esk48_0,
    i_0_196 ).

cnf(c_0_220,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk52_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    i_0_193 ).

cnf(c_0_221,plain,
    ( totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    i_0_121 ).

cnf(c_0_222,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
    | esk51_0 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_214,c_0_215]),c_0_216]),c_0_217])]) ).

cnf(c_0_223,negated_conjecture,
    ~ totalorderedP(esk50_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_218,c_0_219]) ).

cnf(c_0_224,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk51_0 = nil
    | ssItem(esk52_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_220,c_0_215]),c_0_216]),c_0_217])]) ).

cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk50_0 = nil
    | nil != esk51_0 ),
    i_0_194 ).

cnf(c_0_226,plain,
    esk51_0 = nil,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_222]),c_0_223]),c_0_224]) ).

cnf(c_0_227,negated_conjecture,
    esk50_0 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_225,c_0_226])]) ).

cnf(c_0_228,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    i_0_122 ).

cnf(c_0_229,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_223,c_0_227]),c_0_228])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.08  % Problem  : SWC275+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.08  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:00:42 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.32  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.10/0.33  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.33  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.10/0.33  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.10/0.33  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 5.48/1.90  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.48/1.90  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.48/1.90  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.48/1.90  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 5.48/1.90  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 5.48/1.90  #
% 5.48/1.90  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 5.48/1.90  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.48/1.90  
% 5.48/1.90  # Proof found!
% 5.48/1.90  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.48/1.90  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.48/1.90  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.48/1.90  
% 5.48/1.90  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.48/1.90  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 5.48/1.90  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 5.48/1.90  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 5.48/1.90  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 5.48/1.90  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------