TSTP Solution File: SWC269+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC269+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 04:01:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.58s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 175 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 28 ( 12 avg)
% Number of connectives : 238 ( 77 ~; 54 |; 95 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 10 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 45 ( 19 !; 26 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f340,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f204,f281]) ).
fof(f281,plain,
~ totalorderedP(sK2),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f206,f202]) ).
fof(f202,plain,
sK0 = sK2,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).
fof(f161,plain,
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK2)
| ~ frontsegP(sK3,X4)
| ~ neq(sK2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK2)
& frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3)
& ssList(sK2)
& ssList(sK1)
& ssList(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f99,f160,f159,f158,f157]) ).
fof(f157,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f158,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& sK0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f159,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& sK0 = X2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
=> ( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(sK2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK2)
& frontsegP(X3,sK2)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(sK2) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f160,plain,
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(sK2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK2)
& frontsegP(X3,sK2)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
=> ( ~ totalorderedP(sK0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,sK2)
| ~ frontsegP(sK3,X4)
| ~ neq(sK2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(sK2)
& frontsegP(sK3,sK2)
& sK0 = sK2
& sK1 = sK3
& ssList(sK3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X0)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ totalorderedP(X4)
| ~ segmentP(X4,X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X4)
| ~ neq(X2,X4)
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& totalorderedP(X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X2)
& X0 = X2
& X1 = X3
& ssList(X3) )
& ssList(X2) )
& ssList(X1) )
& ssList(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( totalorderedP(X0)
| ? [X4] :
( totalorderedP(X4)
& segmentP(X4,X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X4)
& neq(X2,X4)
& ssList(X4) )
| ~ totalorderedP(X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X2)
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ssList(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ( totalorderedP(X0)
| ? [X4] :
( totalorderedP(X4)
& segmentP(X4,X2)
& frontsegP(X3,X4)
& neq(X2,X4)
& ssList(X4) )
| ~ totalorderedP(X2)
| ~ frontsegP(X3,X2)
| X0 != X2
| X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KGn63Y1VLX/Vampire---4.8_21553',co1) ).
fof(f206,plain,
~ totalorderedP(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
totalorderedP(sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWC269+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:13:35 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KGn63Y1VLX/Vampire---4.8_21553
% 0.58/0.74 % (21765)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21764)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21759)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21761)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21760)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21762)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21763)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (21758)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)First to succeed.
% 0.58/0.75 % (21764)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.75 vampire: malloc.c:2617: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)' failed.
% 0.58/0.75 vampire: malloc.c:2617: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)' failed.
% 0.58/0.75 vampire: malloc.c:2617: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)' failed.
% 0.58/0.75 vampire: malloc.c:2617: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)' failed.
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.58/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.58/0.75 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.58/0.75
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)Memory used [KB]: 1161
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.75 % (21765)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.75 % (21721)Success in time 0.382 s
% 0.58/0.75 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------