TSTP Solution File: SWC269+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWC269+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:50:33 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 11.65s 2.38s
% Output   : Proof 20.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWC269+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 16:21:50 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.64  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.64  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.64  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.64  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.64  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.64  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.64  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.64                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.64  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.64  
% 0.21/0.64  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.66  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.68  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 4.68/1.47  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 5.44/1.51  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.77/1.55  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.77/1.55  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.77/1.55  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 5.77/1.55  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.94/1.55  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 11.65/2.35  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.65/2.38  Prover 2: proved (1708ms)
% 11.65/2.38  
% 11.65/2.38  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.65/2.38  
% 11.65/2.39  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 13.21/2.61  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 14.39/2.75  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.39/2.75  Prover 5: stopped
% 14.39/2.76  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 15.66/2.93  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.66/2.93  Prover 3: stopped
% 15.66/2.93  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 16.08/2.94  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.08/2.94  Prover 6: stopped
% 16.23/2.95  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 16.23/2.96  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 16.71/3.05  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.71/3.05  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.05/3.07  Prover 7: Found proof (size 1)
% 17.05/3.07  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 17.05/3.07  Prover 1: proved (2404ms)
% 17.05/3.07  Prover 7: proved (675ms)
% 17.05/3.08  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 17.05/3.08  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 17.05/3.12  Prover 10: stopped
% 17.97/3.21  Prover 11: stopped
% 18.85/3.39  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 18.85/3.40  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.85/3.41  Prover 8: stopped
% 19.66/3.52  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.66/3.52  Prover 0: stopped
% 19.66/3.55  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.16/3.55  Prover 4: stopped
% 20.16/3.55  
% 20.16/3.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 20.16/3.55  
% 20.16/3.55  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 20.16/3.56  Assumptions after simplification:
% 20.16/3.56  ---------------------------------
% 20.16/3.56  
% 20.16/3.56    (co1)
% 20.16/3.56    $false
% 20.16/3.56  
% 20.16/3.56  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 20.16/3.56  --------------------------------------------
% 20.16/3.56  ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20,
% 20.16/3.57  ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32,
% 20.16/3.57  ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44,
% 20.16/3.57  ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56,
% 20.16/3.57  ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68,
% 20.16/3.57  ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8,
% 20.16/3.57  ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91,
% 20.16/3.57  ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95
% 20.16/3.57  
% 20.16/3.57  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 20.16/3.57  ---------------------------------
% 20.16/3.57  
% 20.16/3.57  Begin of proof
% 20.16/3.57  | 
% 20.16/3.57  | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent.
% 20.16/3.57  | 
% 20.16/3.57  End of proof
% 20.16/3.57  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 20.16/3.57  
% 20.16/3.57  2922ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------