TSTP Solution File: SWC263-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC263-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.76s 0.95s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWC263-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 03:06:09 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.46 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.46 The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.46 Sun Jun 12 03:06:09 2022
% 0.22/0.46 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 1386.
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.46 set(auto).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.46 clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 list(usable).
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.46 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.46 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.46 clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.46 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.22/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.22/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.22/0.46 138 back subsumes 137.
% 0.22/0.46 148 back subsumes 142.
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 429 during input processing: 0 [copy,429,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 337.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 281.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 280.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 279.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 269.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 256.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 255.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 254.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 215.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 203.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 202.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 201.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 200.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 183.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 180.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 178.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 174.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 171.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 148.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 147.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 146.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 145.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 144.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 136.
% 0.22/0.46 429 back subsumes 135.
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.51 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.51 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.51 number of clauses in intial UL: 335
% 0.22/0.51 number of clauses initially in problem: 398
% 0.22/0.51 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.22/0.51 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.22/0.51 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.22/0.51 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.22/0.51 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.22/0.51 distinct function count: 46
% 0.22/0.51 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.76/0.95 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.76/0.95 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.76/0.95 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Model 2 [ 1 1 1517 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 true clauses given 1 (50.0%)
% 0.76/0.95 false clauses given 1
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.95 2 3 7
% 0.76/0.95 3 39 3
% 0.76/0.95 4 7 0
% 0.76/0.95 5 1 0
% 0.76/0.95 7 0 6
% 0.76/0.95 9 0 5
% 0.76/0.95 11 0 10
% 0.76/0.95 12 0 8
% 0.76/0.95 13 0 5
% 0.76/0.95 14 0 2
% 0.76/0.95 15 0 6
% 0.76/0.95 16 0 4
% 0.76/0.95 17 0 4
% 0.76/0.95 19 0 2
% 0.76/0.95 21 0 8
% 0.76/0.95 22 0 2
% 0.76/0.95 23 0 4
% 0.76/0.95 tot: 50 76 (60.3% true)
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Model 2 [ 1 1 1517 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.76/0.95 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.76/0.95 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.76/0.95 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 The job finished Sun Jun 12 03:06:09 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------