TSTP Solution File: SWC260+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.77s 0.98s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWC260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 19:39:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.50 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.50 Sat Jun 11 19:39:04 2022
% 0.21/0.50 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 5236.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.50 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.50 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.50 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.50 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.50 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.50 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 177 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssItem(A)| -ssItem(B)|lt(A,B)|A=B| -leq(A,B).
% 0.21/0.50 302 back subsumes 258.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 454 during input processing: 0 [copy,454,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 430.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 395.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 393.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 383.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 381.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 380.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 379.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 378.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 377.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 303.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 300.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 291.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 288.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 286.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 285.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 284.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 277.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 273.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 268.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 264.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 261.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 257.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 253.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 252.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 250.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 247.
% 0.21/0.50 454 back subsumes 185.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.56 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.56 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.56 number of clauses in intial UL: 402
% 0.21/0.56 number of clauses initially in problem: 420
% 0.21/0.56 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 95
% 0.21/0.56 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.21/0.56 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.56 absolute distinct symbol count: 76
% 0.21/0.56 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.21/0.57 distinct function count: 49
% 0.21/0.57 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Model 4 [ 2 1 705 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.98 cons($c1,app(nil,nil))=app(cons($c1,nil),nil).
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.77/0.98 36 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1149.6 K.
% 0.77/0.98 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.77/0.98 sym_ent ( 304) 190 0 190 0 56.4 K
% 0.77/0.98 term ( 32) 81685 76512 5173 18 162.2 K
% 0.77/0.98 rel ( 40) 60504 55396 5108 16 200.2 K
% 0.77/0.98 term_ptr ( 16) 21057 1560 19497 113 306.4 K
% 0.77/0.98 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 fpa_head ( 24) 2036 31 2005 14 47.3 K
% 0.77/0.98 fpa_tree ( 56) 5994 5994 0 19 1.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 context (1288) 14843 14843 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.77/0.98 trail ( 24) 634848 634848 0 5 0.1 K
% 0.77/0.98 imd_tree ( 32) 38 13 25 13 1.2 K
% 0.77/0.98 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 is_tree ( 24) 1248 88 1160 28 27.8 K
% 0.77/0.98 is_pos (2424) 41220 41220 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.77/0.98 fsub_pos ( 16) 5692 5692 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 literal ( 32) 17204 14102 3102 4 97.1 K
% 0.77/0.98 clause ( 88) 2965 2246 719 1 61.9 K
% 0.77/0.98 list ( 272) 107 100 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.77/0.98 clash_nd ( 80) 6285 6285 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.77/0.98 clause_ptr ( 16) 580 52 528 8 8.4 K
% 0.77/0.98 int_ptr ( 16) 4905 3206 1699 7 26.7 K
% 0.77/0.98 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98 formula( 40) 2263 2263 0 961 37.5 K
% 0.77/0.98 formula_ptr( 16) 97 97 0 97 1.5 K
% 0.77/0.98 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.77/0.98 0
% 0.77/0.98 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 conflict time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 new demod time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 post_process time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 back demod time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 back subsume 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 factor time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98 unindex time 0.00
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.77/0.98 false clauses given 3
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 FALSE TRUE
% 0.77/0.98 2 1 9
% 0.77/0.98 3 4 5
% 0.77/0.98 4 6 8
% 0.77/0.98 9 0 2
% 0.77/0.98 12 0 6
% 0.77/0.98 13 0 8
% 0.77/0.98 15 0 6
% 0.77/0.98 17 0 2
% 0.77/0.98 22 0 2
% 0.77/0.98 tot: 11 48 (81.4% true)
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Model 4 [ 2 1 705 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.77/0.98 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.77/0.98 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.77/0.98 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.77/0.98 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.77/0.98 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.77/0.98 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.77/0.98 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.77/0.98 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.77/0.98 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.77/0.98 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:47
% 0.77/0.98 All others: 488.
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.77/0.98
% 0.77/0.98 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------