TSTP Solution File: SWC259-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWC259-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:37:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 24 ~; 23 |; 0 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f295,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f233,f264,f276,f286,f294]) ).
fof(f294,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_6
| ~ spl0_11 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f293]) ).
fof(f293,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_6
| ~ spl0_11 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f292,f209]) ).
fof(f209,plain,
~ totalorderedP(sk3),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
~ totalorderedP(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f292,plain,
( totalorderedP(sk3)
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_6
| ~ spl0_11 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f291,f247]) ).
fof(f247,plain,
( sk3 = cons(sk5,nil)
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f245]) ).
fof(f245,plain,
( spl0_6
<=> sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).
fof(f291,plain,
( totalorderedP(cons(sk5,nil))
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_11 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f223,f274]) ).
fof(f274,plain,
( ! [X1] :
( totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) )
| ~ spl0_11 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f273]) ).
fof(f273,plain,
( spl0_11
<=> ! [X1] :
( totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_11])]) ).
fof(f223,plain,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f221]) ).
fof(f221,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ssItem(sk5) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f286,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f285]) ).
fof(f285,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f283,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
totalorderedP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause4) ).
fof(f283,plain,
( ~ totalorderedP(nil)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f209,f232]) ).
fof(f232,plain,
( nil = sk3
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f230]) ).
fof(f230,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> nil = sk3 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f276,plain,
spl0_11,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f67,f273]) ).
fof(f67,axiom,
! [X0] :
( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause67) ).
fof(f264,plain,
( spl0_6
| spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f203,f230,f245]) ).
fof(f203,axiom,
( nil = sk3
| sk3 = cons(sk5,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).
fof(f233,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f194,f230,f221]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
( nil = sk3
| ssItem(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC259-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 02:54:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/0.74 % (8531)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8525)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8527)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8526)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8528)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8530)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (8532)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.52/0.74
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)Memory used [KB]: 1197
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.52/0.74 % (8530)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74 % (8528)First to succeed.
% 0.52/0.74 % (8527)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.74 % (8532)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.74 % (8531)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74 % (8528)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-8524"
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.74
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)Memory used [KB]: 1219
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.60/0.74 % (8528)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.60/0.74 % (8524)Success in time 0.385 s
% 0.60/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------