TSTP Solution File: SWC257+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SWC257+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:42:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  225 (  86 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  270 (  74   ~;  72   |; 112   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn;  25   !;  32   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f65,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssItem(X0)
     => totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax65) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax66) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ( ( nil != X2
                      | nil != X3 )
                    & ! [X4] :
                        ( ? [X5] :
                            ( leq(X4,X5)
                            & memberP(X3,X5)
                            & X4 != X5
                            & ssItem(X5) )
                        | ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                        | cons(X4,nil) != X2
                        | ~ ssItem(X4) ) )
                  | totalorderedP(X0)
                  | X0 != X2
                  | X1 != X3
                  | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ( ( nil != X2
                        | nil != X3 )
                      & ! [X4] :
                          ( ? [X5] :
                              ( leq(X4,X5)
                              & memberP(X3,X5)
                              & X4 != X5
                              & ssItem(X5) )
                          | ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                          | cons(X4,nil) != X2
                          | ~ ssItem(X4) ) )
                    | totalorderedP(X0)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ~ ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                            | X4 = X5
                            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f342,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ( nil = X2
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | ? [X4] :
                          ( ! [X5] :
                              ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                              | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                              | X4 = X5
                              | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                          & memberP(X3,X4)
                          & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                          & ssItem(X4) ) )
                    & ~ totalorderedP(X0)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                            | X4 = X5
                            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
                  & sK53 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK53) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ( nil = X2
                    & nil = X3 )
                  | ? [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                          | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                          | X4 = X5
                          | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                      & memberP(X3,X4)
                      & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                      & ssItem(X4) ) )
                & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
                & sK53 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ( nil = X2
                  & nil = X3 )
                | ? [X4] :
                    ( ! [X5] :
                        ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                        | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                        | X4 = X5
                        | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                    & memberP(X3,X4)
                    & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                    & ssItem(X4) ) )
              & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
              & sK53 = X2
              & sK54 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK54) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( nil = X2
                & nil = X3 )
              | ? [X4] :
                  ( ! [X5] :
                      ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                      | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                      | X4 = X5
                      | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                  & memberP(X3,X4)
                  & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                  & ssItem(X4) ) )
            & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
            & sK53 = X2
            & sK54 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( nil = sK55
              & nil = X3 )
            | ? [X4] :
                ( ! [X5] :
                    ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                    | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                    | X4 = X5
                    | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                & memberP(X3,X4)
                & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
                & ssItem(X4) ) )
          & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
          & sK53 = sK55
          & sK54 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK55) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f345,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ( nil = sK55
            & nil = X3 )
          | ? [X4] :
              ( ! [X5] :
                  ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                  | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                  | X4 = X5
                  | ~ ssItem(X5) )
              & memberP(X3,X4)
              & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
              & ssItem(X4) ) )
        & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
        & sK53 = sK55
        & sK54 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ( nil = sK55
          & nil = sK56 )
        | ? [X4] :
            ( ! [X5] :
                ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                | ~ memberP(sK56,X5)
                | X4 = X5
                | ~ ssItem(X5) )
            & memberP(sK56,X4)
            & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
            & ssItem(X4) ) )
      & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
      & sK53 = sK55
      & sK54 = sK56
      & ssList(sK56) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ( ? [X4] :
        ( ! [X5] :
            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
            | ~ memberP(sK56,X5)
            | X4 = X5
            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
        & memberP(sK56,X4)
        & cons(X4,nil) = sK55
        & ssItem(X4) )
   => ( ! [X5] :
          ( ~ leq(sK57,X5)
          | ~ memberP(sK56,X5)
          | sK57 = X5
          | ~ ssItem(X5) )
      & memberP(sK56,sK57)
      & sK55 = cons(sK57,nil)
      & ssItem(sK57) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ( ( ( nil = sK55
        & nil = sK56 )
      | ( ! [X5] :
            ( ~ leq(sK57,X5)
            | ~ memberP(sK56,X5)
            | sK57 = X5
            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
        & memberP(sK56,sK57)
        & sK55 = cons(sK57,nil)
        & ssItem(sK57) ) )
    & ~ totalorderedP(sK53)
    & sK53 = sK55
    & sK54 = sK56
    & ssList(sK56)
    & ssList(sK55)
    & ssList(sK54)
    & ssList(sK53) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK53,sK54,sK55,sK56,sK57])],[f221,f346,f345,f344,f343,f342]) ).

fof(f502,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f180]) ).

fof(f503,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f552,plain,
    sK53 = sK55,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f553,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK53),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f558,plain,
    ( nil = sK55
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f559,plain,
    ( nil = sK55
    | sK55 = cons(sK57,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f347]) ).

fof(f562,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK55),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f553,f552]) ).

cnf(c_203,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X0)
    | totalorderedP(cons(X0,nil)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f502]) ).

cnf(c_204,plain,
    totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f503]) ).

cnf(c_248,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sK57,nil) = sK55
    | nil = sK55 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f559]) ).

cnf(c_249,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sK55
    | ssItem(sK57) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f558]) ).

cnf(c_254,negated_conjecture,
    ~ totalorderedP(sK55),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f562]) ).

cnf(c_12109,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK57)
    | nil = sK55
    | totalorderedP(sK55) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_248,c_203]) ).

cnf(c_12110,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK57)
    | nil = sK55 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12109,c_254]) ).

cnf(c_12138,plain,
    nil = sK55,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_12110,c_249,c_12110]) ).

cnf(c_12147,plain,
    ~ totalorderedP(nil),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_254,c_12138]) ).

cnf(c_12149,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12147,c_204]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWC257+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 16:33:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.48/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.48/1.17  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.48/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.48/1.17  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  clauses                                 191
% 0.48/1.17  conjectures                             11
% 0.48/1.17  EPR                                     58
% 0.48/1.17  Horn                                    115
% 0.48/1.17  unary                                   19
% 0.48/1.17  binary                                  46
% 0.48/1.17  lits                                    643
% 0.48/1.17  lits eq                                 90
% 0.48/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 0.48/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 0.48/1.17  fd_cond                                 23
% 0.48/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          14
% 0.48/1.17  AC symbols                              0
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ 
% 0.48/1.17  Current options:
% 0.48/1.17  ------ 
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.48/1.17  
% 0.48/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------