TSTP Solution File: SWC257+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC257+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:02:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s 1.12s
% Output   : Refutation 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWC257+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 08:47:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.92/1.12  
% 0.92/1.12  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.92/1.12  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.92/1.12  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.12  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.92/1.12  SPASS derived 996 clauses, backtracked 641 clauses, performed 23 splits and kept 1488 clauses.
% 0.92/1.12  SPASS allocated 98940 KBytes.
% 0.92/1.12  SPASS spent	0:00:00.76 on the problem.
% 0.92/1.12  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.92/1.12  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.92/1.12  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.92/1.12  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.92/1.12  		0:00:00.43 for the reduction.
% 0.92/1.12  
% 0.92/1.12  
% 0.92/1.12  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 50 :
% 0.92/1.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.92/1.12  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.12  6[0:Inp] ||  -> cyclefreeP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  7[0:Inp] ||  -> totalorderP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  8[0:Inp] ||  -> strictorderP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  9[0:Inp] ||  -> totalorderedP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  10[0:Inp] ||  -> strictorderedP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  11[0:Inp] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  12[0:Inp] ||  -> equalelemsP(nil)*.
% 0.92/1.12  13[0:Inp] || totalorderedP(skc4)* -> .
% 0.92/1.12  52[0:Inp] ||  -> ssItem(skf44(u,v))*.
% 0.92/1.12  68[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(nil,skc5).
% 0.92/1.12  69[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.92/1.12  70[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(nil,u)* -> .
% 0.92/1.12  74[0:Inp] ssItem(u) ||  -> totalorderedP(cons(u,nil))*.
% 0.92/1.12  79[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v) memberP(u,skf44(u,v))*.
% 0.92/1.12  86[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(u,v) equal(cons(skf44(u,v),nil),v)**.
% 0.92/1.12  187[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssList(v) || equal(tl(u),tl(v))* equal(hd(u),hd(v)) -> equal(u,v) equal(nil,v) equal(nil,u).
% 0.92/1.12  196[0:Rew:69.1,68.1] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> equal(skc5,skc4).
% 0.92/1.12  285[0:Res:2.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u) equal(nil,skc4).
% 0.92/1.12  456[0:Res:1.0,187.1] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u) equal(nil,skc5).
% 0.92/1.12  559[1:Spt:456.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc5)**.
% 0.92/1.12  631[1:Rew:559.0,12.0] ||  -> equalelemsP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  632[1:Rew:559.0,11.0] ||  -> duplicatefreeP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  633[1:Rew:559.0,10.0] ||  -> strictorderedP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  634[1:Rew:559.0,9.0] ||  -> totalorderedP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  635[1:Rew:559.0,8.0] ||  -> strictorderP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  636[1:Rew:559.0,7.0] ||  -> totalorderP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  637[1:Rew:559.0,6.0] ||  -> cyclefreeP(skc5)*.
% 0.92/1.12  653[1:Rew:559.0,70.1] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc5,u)* -> .
% 0.92/1.12  759[2:Spt:196.1] ||  -> equal(skc5,skc4)**.
% 0.92/1.12  863[2:Rew:759.0,634.0] ||  -> totalorderedP(skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.12  913[2:MRR:863.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1009[2:Spt:913.0,196.1,759.0] || equal(skc5,skc4)** -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1010[2:Spt:913.0,196.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1056[1:Res:79.1,653.1] ssItem(skf44(skc5,u)) ||  -> SkP0(skc5,u)*.
% 0.92/1.12  1057[1:SSi:1056.0,52.0,637.0,636.0,635.0,634.0,633.0,632.0,631.0,1.0] ||  -> SkP0(skc5,u)*.
% 0.92/1.12  1058[2:UnC:1057.0,1010.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1059[1:Spt:1058.0,456.5,559.0] || equal(nil,skc5)** -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1060[1:Spt:1058.0,456.0,456.1,456.2,456.3,456.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc5),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc5),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc5,u).
% 0.92/1.12  1075[2:Spt:285.5] ||  -> equal(nil,skc4)**.
% 0.92/1.12  1081[2:Rew:1075.0,9.0] ||  -> totalorderedP(skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.12  1166[2:MRR:1081.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1246[2:Spt:1166.0,285.5,1075.0] || equal(nil,skc4)** -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1247[2:Spt:1166.0,285.0,285.1,285.2,285.3,285.4] ssList(u) || equal(tl(skc4),tl(u))* equal(hd(skc4),hd(u)) -> equal(nil,u) equal(skc4,u).
% 0.92/1.12  1253[2:MRR:69.1,1246.0] || SkP0(skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.92/1.12  1373[0:SpR:86.1,74.1] ssItem(skf44(u,v)) ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* totalorderedP(v).
% 0.92/1.12  1382[0:SSi:1373.0,52.0] ||  -> SkP0(u,v)* totalorderedP(v).
% 0.92/1.12  1391[2:Res:1382.0,1253.0] ||  -> totalorderedP(skc4)*.
% 0.92/1.12  1392[2:MRR:1391.0,13.0] ||  -> .
% 0.92/1.12  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.92/1.12  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax2 ax60 ax62 ax64 ax66 ax69 ax72 ax74 ax38 ax65 ax77
% 0.92/1.12  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------