TSTP Solution File: SWC256+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWC256+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:57:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 4 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 12 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(12,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X)
| singletonP(X)
| ~ ssItem(Y)
| cons(Y,nil) != X ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax4) ).
cnf(81,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X)
| ~ ssList(Y)
| ~ neq(X,Y)
| X != Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).
cnf(84,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
cnf(188,negated_conjecture,
ssList('SKOLEMAAAQ48'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(189,negated_conjecture,
ssList('SKOLEMAAAQ49'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(192,negated_conjecture,
'SKOLEMAAAQ49' = 'SKOLEMAAAQ51',
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(193,negated_conjecture,
'SKOLEMAAAQ48' = 'SKOLEMAAAQ50',
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(194,negated_conjecture,
neq('SKOLEMAAAQ49',nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(195,negated_conjecture,
~ singletonP('SKOLEMAAAQ48'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(196,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem('SKOLEMAAAQ52')
| nil = 'SKOLEMAAAQ51' ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(197,plain,
( ssItem('SKOLEMAAAQ52')
| nil = 'SKOLEMAAAQ49' ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[196,192,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(200,negated_conjecture,
( cons('SKOLEMAAAQ52',nil) = 'SKOLEMAAAQ50'
| nil = 'SKOLEMAAAQ51' ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
cnf(201,plain,
( cons('SKOLEMAAAQ52',nil) = 'SKOLEMAAAQ48'
| nil = 'SKOLEMAAAQ49' ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[200,192,193,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(394,plain,
nil != 'SKOLEMAAAQ49',
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[81,189,84,194]) ).
cnf(395,plain,
ssItem('SKOLEMAAAQ52'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[197,394]) ).
cnf(396,plain,
cons('SKOLEMAAAQ52',nil) = 'SKOLEMAAAQ48',
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[201,394]) ).
cnf(476,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,188,195,395,396]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : SWC256+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.09 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 16:26:58 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.38 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.14/0.38 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.14/0.38 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 "."
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T16:26:58
% 0.14/0.38 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n016.cluster.edu at 2022-06-12T16:26:58
% 0.14/0.52
% 0.14/0.52
% 0.14/0.52 #||
% 0.14/0.52 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.52 ||#
% 0.14/0.52
% 0.14/0.52 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.14/0.52 ; 702 formulas have been input or derived (from 128 formulas).
% 0.14/0.52 ; 476 (68%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.14/0.52 ; 111 (23%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.14/0.52 ; 365 (77%) are still being kept.
% 0.14/0.52 ;
% 0.14/0.52 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.023 17% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.008 6% Assert (96 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.029 21% Process new row (677 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.024 18% Resolution (254 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (127 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (6 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.002 1% Condensing (323 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.005 4% Forward subsumption (323 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.001 1% Backward subsumption (313 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.001 1% Clause clause subsumption (89 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.015 11% Forward simplification (677 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.006 4% Backward simplification (470 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.001 1% Ordering (290 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.022 16% Other
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.137 Total
% 0.14/0.52 ; 0.139 Real time
% 0.14/0.52 ;
% 0.14/0.52 ; Term-hash-array has 683 terms in all.
% 0.14/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 218 entries (300 at peak, 313 added, 95 deleted).
% 0.14/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 709 nodes (964 at peak, 997 added, 288 deleted).
% 0.14/0.52 ; Retrieved 155 possibly forward subsuming rows in 323 calls.
% 0.14/0.52 ; Retrieved 105 possibly backward subsumed rows in 313 calls.
% 0.14/0.52 ; Path-index has 602 entries (627 at peak, 723 added, 121 deleted).
% 0.14/0.52 ; Path-index has 1,175 nodes (1,211 at peak, 1,295 added, 120 deleted).
% 0.14/0.52 ; Trie-index has 602 entries (627 at peak, 723 added, 121 deleted).
% 0.14/0.52 ; Trie-index has 1,280 nodes (1,280 at peak, 1,418 added, 138 deleted).
% 0.14/0.52 ; Retrieved 234 generalization terms in 1,205 calls.
% 0.14/0.52 ; Retrieved 156 instance terms in 156 calls.
% 0.14/0.52 ; Retrieved 28,387 unifiable terms in 1,716 calls.
% 0.14/0.52 ;
% 0.14/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to process has 11 entries:
% 0.14/0.52 ; 4 with value 4 6 with value 8 1 with value 14
% 0.14/0.52 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 75 entries:
% 0.14/0.52 ; 6 with value 16 5 with value 22 1 with value 29
% 0.14/0.52 ; 4 with value 17 2 with value 23 1 with value 32
% 0.14/0.52 ; 7 with value 18 3 with value 24 1 with value 35
% 0.14/0.52 ; 2 with value 19 8 with value 25 3 with value 40
% 0.14/0.52 ; 11 with value 20 3 with value 26 3 with value 44
% 0.14/0.52 ; 9 with value 21 6 with value 27
% 0.14/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to give has 168 entries:
% 0.14/0.52 ; 7 with value (4 4) 32 with value (4 7) 16 with value (4 10)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 43 with value (4 5) 21 with value (4 8) 3 with value (4 11)
% 0.14/0.52 ; 6 with value (4 6) 40 with value (4 9)
% 0.14/0.52 Evaluation took:
% 0.14/0.52 0.139 seconds of real time
% 0.14/0.52 0.127203 seconds of user run time
% 0.14/0.52 0.01214 seconds of system run time
% 0.14/0.52 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.14/0.52 0 page faults and
% 0.14/0.52 8,663,464 bytes consed.
% 0.14/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.14/0.52 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T16:26:58
% 0.14/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.14/0.52 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------