TSTP Solution File: SWC256+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SWC256+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 11:06:17 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  252 (  93 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  303 ( 108   ~; 109   |;  64   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   0 sgn  44   !;  13   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(9,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpTn7Iil/sel_SWC256+1.p_1',ax21) ).

fof(14,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ( singletonP(X1)
      <=> ? [X2] :
            ( ssItem(X2)
            & cons(X2,nil) = X1 ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpTn7Iil/sel_SWC256+1.p_1',ax4) ).

fof(16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpTn7Iil/sel_SWC256+1.p_1',ax15) ).

fof(18,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/tmp/tmpTn7Iil/sel_SWC256+1.p_1',ax17) ).

fof(25,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                    | singletonP(X1)
                    | ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                         => ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
                            | ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                      & ( nil != X4
                        | nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpTn7Iil/sel_SWC256+1.p_1',co1) ).

fof(26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                      | singletonP(X1)
                      | ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
                              | ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                        & ( nil != X4
                          | nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[25]) ).

fof(29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                      | singletonP(X1)
                      | ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
                              | ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                        & ( nil != X4
                          | nil != X3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[26,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(63,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ ssItem(X2)
          | nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

fof(64,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ ssList(X3)
      | ! [X4] :
          ( ~ ssItem(X4)
          | nil != cons(X4,X3) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

fof(65,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ ssItem(X4)
      | nil != cons(X4,X3)
      | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil != cons(X2,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

fof(94,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(X1)
      | ( ( ~ singletonP(X1)
          | ? [X2] :
              ( ssItem(X2)
              & cons(X2,nil) = X1 ) )
        & ( ! [X2] :
              ( ~ ssItem(X2)
              | cons(X2,nil) != X1 )
          | singletonP(X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

fof(95,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ ssList(X3)
      | ( ( ~ singletonP(X3)
          | ? [X4] :
              ( ssItem(X4)
              & cons(X4,nil) = X3 ) )
        & ( ! [X5] :
              ( ~ ssItem(X5)
              | cons(X5,nil) != X3 )
          | singletonP(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[94]) ).

fof(96,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ ssList(X3)
      | ( ( ~ singletonP(X3)
          | ( ssItem(esk7_1(X3))
            & cons(esk7_1(X3),nil) = X3 ) )
        & ( ! [X5] :
              ( ~ ssItem(X5)
              | cons(X5,nil) != X3 )
          | singletonP(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[95]) ).

fof(97,plain,
    ! [X3,X5] :
      ( ( ( ~ ssItem(X5)
          | cons(X5,nil) != X3
          | singletonP(X3) )
        & ( ~ singletonP(X3)
          | ( ssItem(esk7_1(X3))
            & cons(esk7_1(X3),nil) = X3 ) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[96]) ).

fof(98,plain,
    ! [X3,X5] :
      ( ( ~ ssItem(X5)
        | cons(X5,nil) != X3
        | singletonP(X3)
        | ~ ssList(X3) )
      & ( ssItem(esk7_1(X3))
        | ~ singletonP(X3)
        | ~ ssList(X3) )
      & ( cons(esk7_1(X3),nil) = X3
        | ~ singletonP(X3)
        | ~ ssList(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[97]) ).

cnf(101,plain,
    ( singletonP(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | cons(X2,nil) != X1
    | ~ ssItem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[98]) ).

fof(106,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(X1)
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ ssList(X2)
          | ( ( ~ neq(X1,X2)
              | X1 != X2 )
            & ( X1 = X2
              | neq(X1,X2) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

fof(107,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ ssList(X3)
      | ! [X4] :
          ( ~ ssList(X4)
          | ( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
              | X3 != X4 )
            & ( X3 = X4
              | neq(X3,X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[106]) ).

fof(108,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ ssList(X4)
      | ( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
          | X3 != X4 )
        & ( X3 = X4
          | neq(X3,X4) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[107]) ).

fof(109,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
        | X3 != X4
        | ~ ssList(X4)
        | ~ ssList(X3) )
      & ( X3 = X4
        | neq(X3,X4)
        | ~ ssList(X4)
        | ~ ssList(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[108]) ).

cnf(111,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ neq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[109]) ).

cnf(116,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

fof(145,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
      & ? [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
          & ? [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
              & ? [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                  & X2 = X4
                  & X1 = X3
                  & neq(X2,nil)
                  & ~ singletonP(X1)
                  & ( ? [X5] :
                        ( ssItem(X5)
                        & cons(X5,nil) = X3
                        & memberP(X4,X5) )
                    | ( nil = X4
                      & nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

fof(146,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X6] :
      ( ssList(X6)
      & ? [X7] :
          ( ssList(X7)
          & ? [X8] :
              ( ssList(X8)
              & ? [X9] :
                  ( ssList(X9)
                  & X7 = X9
                  & X6 = X8
                  & neq(X7,nil)
                  & ~ singletonP(X6)
                  & ( ? [X10] :
                        ( ssItem(X10)
                        & cons(X10,nil) = X8
                        & memberP(X9,X10) )
                    | ( nil = X9
                      & nil = X8 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[145]) ).

fof(147,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk8_0)
    & ssList(esk9_0)
    & ssList(esk10_0)
    & ssList(esk11_0)
    & esk9_0 = esk11_0
    & esk8_0 = esk10_0
    & neq(esk9_0,nil)
    & ~ singletonP(esk8_0)
    & ( ( ssItem(esk12_0)
        & cons(esk12_0,nil) = esk10_0
        & memberP(esk11_0,esk12_0) )
      | ( nil = esk11_0
        & nil = esk10_0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[146]) ).

fof(148,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk8_0)
    & ssList(esk9_0)
    & ssList(esk10_0)
    & ssList(esk11_0)
    & esk9_0 = esk11_0
    & esk8_0 = esk10_0
    & neq(esk9_0,nil)
    & ~ singletonP(esk8_0)
    & ( nil = esk11_0
      | ssItem(esk12_0) )
    & ( nil = esk10_0
      | ssItem(esk12_0) )
    & ( nil = esk11_0
      | cons(esk12_0,nil) = esk10_0 )
    & ( nil = esk10_0
      | cons(esk12_0,nil) = esk10_0 )
    & ( nil = esk11_0
      | memberP(esk11_0,esk12_0) )
    & ( nil = esk10_0
      | memberP(esk11_0,esk12_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[147]) ).

cnf(151,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk12_0,nil) = esk10_0
    | nil = esk10_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(152,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk12_0,nil) = esk10_0
    | nil = esk11_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(153,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk12_0)
    | nil = esk10_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(154,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk12_0)
    | nil = esk11_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(155,negated_conjecture,
    ~ singletonP(esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(156,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk9_0,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(157,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_0 = esk10_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(158,negated_conjecture,
    esk9_0 = esk11_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(162,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk8_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[148]) ).

cnf(163,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk10_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[162,157,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(165,negated_conjecture,
    ~ singletonP(esk10_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[155,157,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(166,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk11_0,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[156,158,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(174,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk11_0 = nil
    | esk10_0 != nil
    | ~ ssItem(esk12_0)
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,152,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(177,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk11_0 = nil
    | esk10_0 != nil
    | ~ ssItem(esk12_0)
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[174,116,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(178,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk11_0 = nil
    | esk10_0 != nil
    | ~ ssItem(esk12_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[177,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(185,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X1,X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[111,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(187,negated_conjecture,
    ( singletonP(X1)
    | esk10_0 = nil
    | esk10_0 != X1
    | ~ ssItem(esk12_0)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[101,151,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(388,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk11_0 = nil
    | esk10_0 != nil ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[178,154]) ).

cnf(395,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 = nil
    | singletonP(X1)
    | esk10_0 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[187,153]) ).

cnf(396,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 = nil
    | singletonP(esk10_0)
    | ~ ssList(esk10_0) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[395,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(397,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 = nil
    | singletonP(esk10_0)
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[396,163,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(398,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 = nil
    | singletonP(esk10_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[397,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(399,negated_conjecture,
    esk10_0 = nil,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[398,165,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(407,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk11_0 = nil
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[388,399,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(408,negated_conjecture,
    esk11_0 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[407,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(416,negated_conjecture,
    neq(nil,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[166,408,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(423,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ssList(nil),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[185,416,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(425,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[423,116,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(426,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[425,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(427,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    426,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWC/SWC256+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SWC001+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpTn7Iil/sel_SWC256+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWC256+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWC/SWC256+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWC/SWC256+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------