TSTP Solution File: SWC254+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC254+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:00:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  280 (  67 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  305 (  81   ~;  74   |; 124   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   5 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  112 (  65   !;  47   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f298,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f212,f214,f249,f268,f297]) ).

fof(f297,plain,
    ( ~ spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f273,f207]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ( sP0(sK5,sK6,sK5,sK6)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f205]) ).

fof(f205,plain,
    ( spl12_1
  <=> sP0(sK5,sK6,sK5,sK6) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl12_1])]) ).

fof(f273,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0,X1] : ~ sP0(sK5,X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ spl12_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f246,f152]) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ singletonP(X0)
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ singletonP(X0)
        & app(sK2(X1,X2),cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil)) = X1
        & cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil) = X2
        & ssList(sK2(X1,X2))
        & ssItem(sK1(X1,X2))
        & neq(X3,nil) )
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f124,f126,f125]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ? [X5] :
              ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X1
              & cons(X4,nil) = X2
              & ssList(X5) )
          & ssItem(X4) )
     => ( ? [X5] :
            ( app(X5,cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil)) = X1
            & cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil) = X2
            & ssList(X5) )
        & ssItem(sK1(X1,X2)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X5] :
          ( app(X5,cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil)) = X1
          & cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil) = X2
          & ssList(X5) )
     => ( app(sK2(X1,X2),cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil)) = X1
        & cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil) = X2
        & ssList(sK2(X1,X2)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ singletonP(X0)
        & ? [X4] :
            ( ? [X5] :
                ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X1
                & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                & ssList(X5) )
            & ssItem(X4) )
        & neq(X3,nil) )
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f123]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ! [X0,X3,X2,X1] :
      ( ( ~ singletonP(X0)
        & ? [X4] :
            ( ? [X5] :
                ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
                & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                & ssList(X5) )
            & ssItem(X4) )
        & neq(X1,nil) )
      | ~ sP0(X0,X3,X2,X1) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ! [X0,X3,X2,X1] :
      ( ( ~ singletonP(X0)
        & ? [X4] :
            ( ? [X5] :
                ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
                & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                & ssList(X5) )
            & ssItem(X4) )
        & neq(X1,nil) )
      | ~ sP0(X0,X3,X2,X1) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    ( singletonP(sK5)
    | ~ spl12_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f244]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    ( spl12_4
  <=> singletonP(sK5) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl12_4])]) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    ( ~ spl12_1
    | spl12_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f267]) ).

fof(f267,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl12_1
    | spl12_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f263,f207]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ sP0(X0,sK6,sK5,X1)
    | spl12_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f242,f148]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ssItem(sK1(X1,X2))
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f242,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK1(sK6,sK5))
    | spl12_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f240]) ).

fof(f240,plain,
    ( spl12_3
  <=> ssItem(sK1(sK6,sK5)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl12_3])]) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ( spl12_4
    | ~ spl12_3
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f248,f205,f240,f244]) ).

fof(f248,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK1(sK6,sK5))
    | singletonP(sK5)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f235,f155]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ssList(sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ neq(sK6,nil)
        & neq(sK4,nil) )
      | sP0(sK3,sK6,sK5,sK4) )
    & sK3 = sK5
    & sK4 = sK6
    & ssList(sK6)
    & ssList(sK5)
    & ssList(sK4)
    & ssList(sK3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f122,f131,f130,f129,f128]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                        & neq(X1,nil) )
                      | sP0(X0,X3,X2,X1) )
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | sP0(sK3,X3,X2,X1) )
                  & sK3 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    & neq(X1,nil) )
                  | sP0(sK3,X3,X2,X1) )
                & sK3 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & neq(sK4,nil) )
                | sP0(sK3,X3,X2,sK4) )
              & sK3 = X2
              & sK4 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK4) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                & neq(sK4,nil) )
              | sP0(sK3,X3,X2,sK4) )
            & sK3 = X2
            & sK4 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
              & neq(sK4,nil) )
            | sP0(sK3,X3,sK5,sK4) )
          & sK3 = sK5
          & sK4 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK5) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
            & neq(sK4,nil) )
          | sP0(sK3,X3,sK5,sK4) )
        & sK3 = sK5
        & sK4 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ( ~ neq(sK6,nil)
          & neq(sK4,nil) )
        | sP0(sK3,sK6,sK5,sK4) )
      & sK3 = sK5
      & sK4 = sK6
      & ssList(sK6) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | sP0(X0,X3,X2,X1) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f99,f121]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ~ singletonP(X0)
                      & ? [X4] :
                          ( ? [X5] :
                              ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
                              & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          & ssItem(X4) )
                      & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ~ singletonP(X0)
                      & ? [X4] :
                          ( ? [X5] :
                              ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) = X3
                              & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          & ssItem(X4) )
                      & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                        & ( singletonP(X0)
                          | ! [X4] :
                              ( ssItem(X4)
                             => ! [X5] :
                                  ( ssList(X5)
                                 => ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3
                                    | cons(X4,nil) != X2 ) ) )
                          | ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                        | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                      & ( singletonP(X0)
                        | ! [X4] :
                            ( ssItem(X4)
                           => ! [X5] :
                                ( ssList(X5)
                               => ( app(X5,cons(X4,nil)) != X3
                                  | cons(X4,nil) != X2 ) ) )
                        | ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3M6v9456DP/Vampire---4.8_1930',co1) ).

fof(f235,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK5)
    | ~ ssItem(sK1(sK6,sK5))
    | singletonP(sK5)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f200,f233]) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    ( sK5 = cons(sK1(sK6,sK5),nil)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f150,f207]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | cons(sK1(X1,X2),nil) = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f200,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X1)
      | singletonP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f191]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( singletonP(X0)
      | cons(X1,nil) != X0
      | ~ ssItem(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f146]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( singletonP(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) != X0
              | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
        & ( ( cons(sK11(X0),nil) = X0
            & ssItem(sK11(X0)) )
          | ~ singletonP(X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11])],[f144,f145]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( cons(X2,nil) = X0
          & ssItem(X2) )
     => ( cons(sK11(X0),nil) = X0
        & ssItem(sK11(X0)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( singletonP(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) != X0
              | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
        & ( ? [X2] :
              ( cons(X2,nil) = X0
              & ssItem(X2) )
          | ~ singletonP(X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f143]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( singletonP(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) != X0
              | ~ ssItem(X1) ) )
        & ( ? [X1] :
              ( cons(X1,nil) = X0
              & ssItem(X1) )
          | ~ singletonP(X0) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( singletonP(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] :
            ( cons(X1,nil) = X0
            & ssItem(X1) ) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ( singletonP(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] :
            ( cons(X1,nil) = X0
            & ssItem(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3M6v9456DP/Vampire---4.8_1930',ax4) ).

fof(f214,plain,
    spl12_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f213,f209]) ).

fof(f209,plain,
    ( spl12_2
  <=> neq(sK6,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl12_2])]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    neq(sK6,nil),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f193,f147]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | neq(X3,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ( neq(sK6,nil)
    | sP0(sK5,sK6,sK5,sK6) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f159,f157,f158,f157]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    sK3 = sK5,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    sK4 = sK6,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ( neq(sK4,nil)
    | sP0(sK3,sK6,sK5,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f192,f209,f205]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK6,nil)
    | sP0(sK5,sK6,sK5,sK6) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f160,f158,f157]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK6,nil)
    | sP0(sK3,sK6,sK5,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SWC254+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:46:18 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3M6v9456DP/Vampire---4.8_1930
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2126)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2128)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2136)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2134)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2127)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2138)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2139)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)Memory used [KB]: 1146
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2139)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2137)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)Memory used [KB]: 1143
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2137)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (2144)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (2145)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/50Mi)
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.75  % (2127)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)Memory used [KB]: 1176
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (2128)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75  % (2086)Success in time 0.386 s
% 0.56/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------