TSTP Solution File: SWC254+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWC254+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:02:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.14s 1.36s
% Output : Refutation 1.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
ssList(skc4),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(52,axiom,
ssItem(skf45(u,v)),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(60,axiom,
( skP0(u,v)
| neq(v,nil) ),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(61,axiom,
( ~ singletonP(u)
| skP0(u,v) ),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(70,axiom,
( ~ skP0(skc4,skc5)
| neq(skc5,nil) ),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(80,axiom,
( ~ neq(skc5,nil)
| ~ skP0(skc4,skc5) ),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(87,axiom,
( skP0(u,v)
| equal(cons(skf45(u,v),nil),u) ),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(122,axiom,
( ~ ssList(u)
| ~ ssItem(v)
| ~ equal(cons(v,nil),u)
| singletonP(u) ),
file('SWC254+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(197,plain,
neq(skc5,nil),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[70,60]),
[iquote('0:MRR:70.0,60.1')] ).
cnf(198,plain,
~ skP0(skc4,skc5),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[80,197]),
[iquote('0:MRR:80.0,197.0')] ).
cnf(323,plain,
( ~ ssItem(u)
| ~ equal(cons(u,nil),skc4)
| singletonP(skc4) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,122]),
[iquote('0:Res:2.0,122.1')] ).
cnf(1892,plain,
~ singletonP(skc4),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[61,198]),
[iquote('0:Res:61.1,198.0')] ).
cnf(1896,plain,
( ~ ssItem(u)
| ~ equal(cons(u,nil),skc4) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[323,1892]),
[iquote('0:MRR:323.2,1892.0')] ).
cnf(1948,plain,
( ~ ssItem(skf45(u,v))
| ~ equal(u,skc4)
| skP0(u,v) ),
inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[87,1896]),
[iquote('0:SpL:87.1,1896.1')] ).
cnf(1949,plain,
( ~ equal(u,skc4)
| skP0(u,v) ),
inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[1948,52]),
[iquote('0:SSi:1948.0,52.0')] ).
cnf(1950,plain,
~ equal(skc4,skc4),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1949,198]),
[iquote('0:Res:1949.1,198.0')] ).
cnf(1951,plain,
$false,
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1950]),
[iquote('0:Obv:1950.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWC254+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 05:43:36 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 1.14/1.36
% 1.14/1.36 SPASS V 3.9
% 1.14/1.36 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.14/1.36 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.14/1.36 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.14/1.36 SPASS derived 1335 clauses, backtracked 660 clauses, performed 22 splits and kept 1630 clauses.
% 1.14/1.36 SPASS allocated 99432 KBytes.
% 1.14/1.36 SPASS spent 0:00:01.03 on the problem.
% 1.14/1.36 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 1.14/1.36 0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.14/1.36 0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 1.14/1.36 0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 1.14/1.36 0:00:00.70 for the reduction.
% 1.14/1.36
% 1.14/1.36
% 1.14/1.36 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 17 :
% 1.14/1.36 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.14/1.36 Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax2 ax17 ax4
% 1.14/1.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------