TSTP Solution File: SWC254+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC254+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:14:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.93s 2.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 9 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_202,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk49_0,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_202) ).
cnf(i_0_204,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_204) ).
cnf(i_0_98,plain,
( singletonP(X1)
| cons(X2,nil) != X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_98) ).
cnf(i_0_195,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_195) ).
cnf(i_0_203,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_203) ).
cnf(i_0_206,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk50_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_206) ).
cnf(i_0_199,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk52_0)
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_199) ).
cnf(i_0_191,negated_conjecture,
( ~ singletonP(esk48_0)
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zgxbxo39/lgb.p',i_0_191) ).
cnf(c_0_215,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk49_0,nil),
i_0_202 ).
cnf(c_0_216,negated_conjecture,
esk49_0 = esk51_0,
i_0_204 ).
cnf(c_0_217,plain,
( singletonP(X1)
| cons(X2,nil) != X1
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2) ),
i_0_98 ).
cnf(c_0_218,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk50_0
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
i_0_195 ).
cnf(c_0_219,negated_conjecture,
esk50_0 = esk48_0,
i_0_203 ).
cnf(c_0_220,negated_conjecture,
neq(esk51_0,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_215,c_0_216]) ).
cnf(c_0_221,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk50_0),
i_0_206 ).
cnf(c_0_222,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk52_0)
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
i_0_199 ).
cnf(c_0_223,negated_conjecture,
( ~ singletonP(esk48_0)
| ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
i_0_191 ).
cnf(c_0_224,plain,
( singletonP(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_217]) ).
cnf(c_0_225,negated_conjecture,
cons(esk52_0,nil) = esk48_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_218,c_0_219]),c_0_220])]) ).
cnf(c_0_226,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk48_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_221,c_0_219]) ).
cnf(c_0_227,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(esk52_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_222,c_0_220])]) ).
cnf(c_0_228,negated_conjecture,
~ singletonP(esk48_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_223,c_0_220])]) ).
cnf(c_0_229,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_224,c_0_225]),c_0_226]),c_0_227])]),c_0_228]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC254+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 06:27:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.93/2.41 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.93/2.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.93/2.41 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.93/2.41 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 7.93/2.41 # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.93/2.41 #
% 7.93/2.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.93/2.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.93/2.41
% 7.93/2.41 # Proof found!
% 7.93/2.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.93/2.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.93/2.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.93/2.41
% 7.93/2.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.93/2.41 # User time : 0.023 s
% 7.93/2.41 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.93/2.41 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 7.93/2.41 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.93/2.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------