TSTP Solution File: SWC248+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWC248+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:14:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.33s 2.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 213 ( 61 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 52 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 290 ( 111 ~; 108 |; 56 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 37 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 88 ( 0 sgn 39 !; 24 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ ssList(X4)
| X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| nil = X1
| ? [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
& ? [X6] :
( ssList(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(app(X6,cons(X5,nil)),X7) = X1
& ! [X8] :
( ~ ssItem(X8)
| ~ memberP(X6,X8)
| ~ memberP(X7,X8)
| ~ lt(X5,X8)
| leq(X5,X8) ) ) ) )
| ! [X9] :
( ssList(X9)
=> ! [X10] :
( ~ ssList(X10)
| app(app(X9,X3),X10) != X4
| ~ totalorderedP(X3)
| ? [X11] :
( ssItem(X11)
& ? [X12] :
( ssList(X12)
& app(X12,cons(X11,nil)) = X9
& ? [X13] :
( ssItem(X13)
& ? [X14] :
( ssList(X14)
& app(cons(X13,nil),X14) = X3
& leq(X11,X13) ) ) ) )
| ? [X15] :
( ssItem(X15)
& ? [X16] :
( ssList(X16)
& app(cons(X15,nil),X16) = X10
& ? [X17] :
( ssItem(X17)
& ? [X18] :
( ssList(X18)
& app(X18,cons(X17,nil)) = X3
& leq(X17,X15) ) ) ) ) ) )
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax38,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssItem(X1)
=> ~ memberP(nil,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax38) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(ax28,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax28) ).
fof(ax81,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax81) ).
fof(ax16,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).
fof(ax20,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ( nil = X1
| ? [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
& ? [X3] :
( ssItem(X3)
& cons(X3,X2) = X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax20) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ~ ssList(X4)
| X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| nil = X1
| ? [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
& ? [X6] :
( ssList(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& app(app(X6,cons(X5,nil)),X7) = X1
& ! [X8] :
( ~ ssItem(X8)
| ~ memberP(X6,X8)
| ~ memberP(X7,X8)
| ~ lt(X5,X8)
| leq(X5,X8) ) ) ) )
| ! [X9] :
( ssList(X9)
=> ! [X10] :
( ~ ssList(X10)
| app(app(X9,X3),X10) != X4
| ~ totalorderedP(X3)
| ? [X11] :
( ssItem(X11)
& ? [X12] :
( ssList(X12)
& app(X12,cons(X11,nil)) = X9
& ? [X13] :
( ssItem(X13)
& ? [X14] :
( ssList(X14)
& app(cons(X13,nil),X14) = X3
& leq(X11,X13) ) ) ) )
| ? [X15] :
( ssItem(X15)
& ? [X16] :
( ssList(X16)
& app(cons(X15,nil),X16) = X10
& ? [X17] :
( ssItem(X17)
& ? [X18] :
( ssList(X18)
& app(X18,cons(X17,nil)) = X3
& leq(X17,X15) ) ) ) ) ) )
| ( nil != X4
& nil = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X169] :
( ~ ssItem(X169)
| ~ memberP(nil,X169) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax38])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X267,X268,X269,X273,X274,X275,X276,X277,X278,X279,X280] :
( ssList(esk48_0)
& ssList(esk49_0)
& ssList(esk50_0)
& ssList(esk51_0)
& esk49_0 = esk51_0
& esk48_0 = esk50_0
& nil != esk48_0
& ( ssItem(esk52_3(X267,X268,X269))
| ~ ssList(X269)
| app(app(X268,cons(X267,nil)),X269) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X268)
| ~ ssItem(X267) )
& ( memberP(X268,esk52_3(X267,X268,X269))
| ~ ssList(X269)
| app(app(X268,cons(X267,nil)),X269) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X268)
| ~ ssItem(X267) )
& ( memberP(X269,esk52_3(X267,X268,X269))
| ~ ssList(X269)
| app(app(X268,cons(X267,nil)),X269) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X268)
| ~ ssItem(X267) )
& ( lt(X267,esk52_3(X267,X268,X269))
| ~ ssList(X269)
| app(app(X268,cons(X267,nil)),X269) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X268)
| ~ ssItem(X267) )
& ( ~ leq(X267,esk52_3(X267,X268,X269))
| ~ ssList(X269)
| app(app(X268,cons(X267,nil)),X269) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X268)
| ~ ssItem(X267) )
& ssList(esk53_0)
& ssList(esk54_0)
& app(app(esk53_0,esk50_0),esk54_0) = esk51_0
& totalorderedP(esk50_0)
& ( ~ ssItem(X273)
| ~ ssList(X274)
| app(X274,cons(X273,nil)) != esk53_0
| ~ ssItem(X275)
| ~ ssList(X276)
| app(cons(X275,nil),X276) != esk50_0
| ~ leq(X273,X275) )
& ( ~ ssItem(X277)
| ~ ssList(X278)
| app(cons(X277,nil),X278) != esk54_0
| ~ ssItem(X279)
| ~ ssList(X280)
| app(X280,cons(X279,nil)) != esk50_0
| ~ leq(X279,X277) )
& ( nil = esk51_0
| nil != esk50_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ memberP(nil,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X1,esk52_3(X2,X1,X3))
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(nil,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(esk52_3(X1,nil,X2))
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk52_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X147] :
( ~ ssList(X147)
| app(nil,X147) = X147 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(nil,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X232,X233] :
( ~ ssList(X232)
| ~ ssItem(X233)
| cons(X233,X232) = app(cons(X233,nil),X232) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X123,X124] :
( ~ ssList(X123)
| ~ ssItem(X124)
| ssList(cons(X124,X123)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ssList(cons(X2,X1))
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X131] :
( ( ssList(esk44_1(X131))
| nil = X131
| ~ ssList(X131) )
& ( ssItem(esk45_1(X131))
| nil = X131
| ~ ssList(X131) )
& ( cons(esk45_1(X131),esk44_1(X131)) = X131
| nil = X131
| ~ ssList(X131) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax20])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( cons(esk45_1(X1),esk44_1(X1)) = X1
| nil = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk48_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
nil != esk48_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssList(esk44_1(esk48_0))
| ~ ssItem(esk45_1(esk48_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),c_0_27])]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ssItem(esk45_1(X1))
| nil = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ ssList(esk44_1(esk48_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_27])]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ssList(esk44_1(X1))
| nil = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_27])]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : SWC248+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 01:55:54 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.22/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.22/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.33/2.62 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.33/2.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.33/2.62 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.33/2.62 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y
% 8.33/2.62 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.33/2.62 #
% 8.33/2.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.036 s
% 8.33/2.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.33/2.62
% 8.33/2.62 # Proof found!
% 8.33/2.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.33/2.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.33/2.62 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.33/2.62
% 8.33/2.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.33/2.62 # User time : 0.068 s
% 8.33/2.62 # System time : 0.012 s
% 8.33/2.62 # Total time : 0.080 s
% 8.33/2.62 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.33/2.62
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------