TSTP Solution File: SWC232-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC232-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:42:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.86s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 11 unt; 2 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 21 equ; 54 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause71,axiom,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause71) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X2,sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause8) ).
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(clause74,axiom,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause74) ).
cnf(clause120,axiom,
( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause120) ).
cnf(clause86,axiom,
( ssList(cons(X1,X2))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause86) ).
cnf(clause109,axiom,
( cons(skaf83(X1),skaf82(X1)) = X1
| nil = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause109) ).
cnf(clause12,axiom,
ssItem(skaf83(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause12) ).
cnf(clause13,axiom,
ssList(skaf82(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',clause13) ).
cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',co1_1) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( ~ memberP(nil,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
clause71 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(X2,sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(nil,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
| ~ ssItem(sk5(X2,nil,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5(X3,X2,X1))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
co1_8 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(nil,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause74 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk1
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
clause120 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,X2) != sk1
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( ssList(cons(X1,X2))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
clause86 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,X2) != sk1
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
( cons(skaf83(X1),skaf82(X1)) = X1
| nil = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause109 ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
ssItem(skaf83(X1)),
clause12 ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
ssList(skaf82(X1)),
clause13 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( nil = X1
| X1 != sk1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk1),
co1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
nil != sk1,
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWC232-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:38:52 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YwqWFxJHmS/E---3.1_13813.p
% 0.86/0.61 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.86/0.61 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13891 completed with status 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.86/0.61 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.86/0.61 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.86/0.61 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 675s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with pid 13900 completed with status 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Result found by G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y
% 0.86/0.61 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.61 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.86/0.61 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.86/0.61 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 675s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.86/0.61 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.86/0.61
% 0.86/0.61 # Proof found!
% 0.86/0.61 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.86/0.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.86/0.61 # Parsed axioms : 202
% 0.86/0.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Initial clauses : 202
% 0.86/0.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 202
% 0.86/0.61 # Processed clauses : 1068
% 0.86/0.61 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.86/0.61 # ...subsumed : 316
% 0.86/0.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 745
% 0.86/0.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 84
% 0.86/0.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Backward-subsumed : 45
% 0.86/0.61 # Backward-rewritten : 14
% 0.86/0.61 # Generated clauses : 3322
% 0.86/0.61 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3061
% 0.86/0.61 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 25
% 0.86/0.61 # Paramodulations : 3219
% 0.86/0.61 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # NegExts : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Equation resolutions : 103
% 0.86/0.61 # Total rewrite steps : 2244
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.61 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.61 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.61 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.61 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.86/0.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 485
% 0.86/0.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 63
% 0.86/0.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.86/0.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 417
% 0.86/0.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2318
% 0.86/0.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 13110
% 0.86/0.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 255
% 0.86/0.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35383
% 0.86/0.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7446
% 0.86/0.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 303
% 0.86/0.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.86/0.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.86/0.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.86/0.61 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.86/0.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 61981
% 0.86/0.61
% 0.86/0.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.86/0.61 # User time : 0.105 s
% 0.86/0.61 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.86/0.61 # Total time : 0.110 s
% 0.86/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 2104 pages
% 0.86/0.61
% 0.86/0.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.86/0.61 # User time : 0.417 s
% 0.86/0.61 # System time : 0.034 s
% 0.86/0.61 # Total time : 0.452 s
% 0.86/0.61 # Maximum resident set size: 1856 pages
% 0.86/0.61 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------