TSTP Solution File: SWC217+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC217+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:39:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  273 (  89 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  319 (  98   ~;  77   |; 118   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (  24   !;  35   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f294,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f243,f248,f253,f254,f265,f293]) ).

fof(f293,plain,
    ( spl11_3
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f292]) ).

fof(f292,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl11_3
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f291,f227]) ).

fof(f227,plain,
    ( nil != sK8
    | spl11_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f226]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ( spl11_3
  <=> nil = sK8 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_3])]) ).

fof(f291,plain,
    ( nil = sK8
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f290,f183]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ssList(sK8),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ( ssList(sK6)
    & ssList(sK7)
    & ( ( memberP(sK9,sK10)
        & cons(sK10,nil) = sK8
        & ssItem(sK10) )
      | ~ neq(sK9,nil) )
    & ssList(sK9)
    & neq(sK7,nil)
    & sK9 = sK7
    & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
    & sK6 = sK8
    & ( nil = sK8
      | nil != sK9 )
    & ssList(sK8) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6,sK7,sK8,sK9,sK10])],[f120,f147,f146,f145,f144,f143]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
        & ? [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
            & ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ? [X4] :
                          ( memberP(X3,X4)
                          & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                          & ssItem(X4) )
                      | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                    & ssList(X3)
                    & neq(X1,nil)
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & ( nil = X2
                      | nil != X3 ) )
                & ssList(X2) ) ) )
   => ( ssList(sK6)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ? [X4] :
                        ( memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
                  & sK6 = X2
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 ) )
              & ssList(X2) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
        & ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ? [X4] :
                      ( memberP(X3,X4)
                      & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                      & ssItem(X4) )
                  | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                & ssList(X3)
                & neq(X1,nil)
                & X1 = X3
                & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
                & sK6 = X2
                & ( nil = X2
                  | nil != X3 ) )
            & ssList(X2) ) )
   => ( ssList(sK7)
      & ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ? [X4] :
                    ( memberP(X3,X4)
                    & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                    & ssItem(X4) )
                | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
              & ssList(X3)
              & neq(sK7,nil)
              & sK7 = X3
              & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
              & sK6 = X2
              & ( nil = X2
                | nil != X3 ) )
          & ssList(X2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ? [X4] :
                  ( memberP(X3,X4)
                  & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                  & ssItem(X4) )
              | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
            & ssList(X3)
            & neq(sK7,nil)
            & sK7 = X3
            & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
            & sK6 = X2
            & ( nil = X2
              | nil != X3 ) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ? [X4] :
                ( memberP(X3,X4)
                & cons(X4,nil) = sK8
                & ssItem(X4) )
            | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
          & ssList(X3)
          & neq(sK7,nil)
          & sK7 = X3
          & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
          & sK6 = sK8
          & ( nil = sK8
            | nil != X3 ) )
      & ssList(sK8) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ? [X4] :
              ( memberP(X3,X4)
              & cons(X4,nil) = sK8
              & ssItem(X4) )
          | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
        & ssList(X3)
        & neq(sK7,nil)
        & sK7 = X3
        & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
        & sK6 = sK8
        & ( nil = sK8
          | nil != X3 ) )
   => ( ( ? [X4] :
            ( memberP(sK9,X4)
            & cons(X4,nil) = sK8
            & ssItem(X4) )
        | ~ neq(sK9,nil) )
      & ssList(sK9)
      & neq(sK7,nil)
      & sK9 = sK7
      & ~ neq(sK6,nil)
      & sK6 = sK8
      & ( nil = sK8
        | nil != sK9 ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ( ? [X4] :
        ( memberP(sK9,X4)
        & cons(X4,nil) = sK8
        & ssItem(X4) )
   => ( memberP(sK9,sK10)
      & cons(sK10,nil) = sK8
      & ssItem(sK10) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
          & ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ? [X4] :
                        ( memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                  & ssList(X3)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 ) )
              & ssList(X2) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f119]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( neq(X1,nil)
                  & ( nil = X2
                    | nil != X3 )
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ( ? [X4] :
                        ( memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ~ neq(X3,nil) )
                  & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | ( nil != X2
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ( ! [X4] :
                            ( ssItem(X4)
                           => ( ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                              | cons(X4,nil) != X2 ) )
                        & neq(X3,nil) )
                      | neq(X0,nil)
                      | X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | ( nil != X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ( ! [X4] :
                          ( ssItem(X4)
                         => ( ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                            | cons(X4,nil) != X2 ) )
                      & neq(X3,nil) )
                    | neq(X0,nil)
                    | X0 != X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sK8)
    | nil = sK8
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f285,f236]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ( ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f235]) ).

fof(f235,plain,
    ( spl11_5
  <=> ssList(nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_5])]) ).

fof(f285,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK8)
    | nil = sK8 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f176,f204]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    ~ neq(sK8,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f186,f185]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    sK6 = sK8,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ~ neq(sK6,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X0)
      | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ssList(X1)
          | ( ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) )
            & ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ssList(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ssList(X1)
          | ( X0 != X1
          <=> neq(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( X0 != X1
          <=> neq(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f265,plain,
    ( ~ spl11_3
    | ~ spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f264,f250,f245,f235,f226]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ( spl11_7
  <=> cons(sK10,nil) = sK8 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_7])]) ).

fof(f250,plain,
    ( spl11_8
  <=> ssItem(sK10) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_8])]) ).

fof(f264,plain,
    ( nil != sK8
    | ~ spl11_5
    | ~ spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f263,f236]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | nil != sK8
    | ~ spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f262,f252]) ).

fof(f252,plain,
    ( ssItem(sK10)
    | ~ spl11_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f250]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK10)
    | nil != sK8
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl11_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f154,f247]) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    ( cons(sK10,nil) = sK8
    | ~ spl11_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f245]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( nil != cons(X1,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( nil != cons(X1,X0)
          | ~ ssItem(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssItem(X1)
         => nil != cons(X1,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax21) ).

fof(f254,plain,
    spl11_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f188,f221]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ( spl11_2
  <=> neq(sK7,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_2])]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    neq(sK7,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f253,plain,
    ( spl11_8
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f202,f221,f250]) ).

fof(f202,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK7,nil)
    | ssItem(sK10) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f190,f187]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    sK9 = sK7,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ( ssItem(sK10)
    | ~ neq(sK9,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f248,plain,
    ( spl11_7
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f201,f221,f245]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK7,nil)
    | cons(sK10,nil) = sK8 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f191,f187]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    ( cons(sK10,nil) = sK8
    | ~ neq(sK9,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).

fof(f243,plain,
    spl11_5,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f166,f235]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWC217+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:27:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.50  % (23706)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)lrs+10_1:1_ins=3:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (23690)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Termination phase: Naming
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (23698)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.52  % (23706)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Time elapsed: 0.064 s
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (23690)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (23679)Success in time 0.168 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------