TSTP Solution File: SWC217+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWC217+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:27:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 1.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  38   ~;  31   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                    | neq(X1,nil)
                    | ( nil != X3
                      & nil = X4 )
                    | ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                         => ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
                            | ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                      & neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).

fof(ax21,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax21) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                      | neq(X1,nil)
                      | ( nil != X3
                        & nil = X4 )
                      | ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ( cons(X5,nil) != X3
                              | ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                        & neq(X4,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk1_0)
    & ssList(esk2_0)
    & ssList(esk3_0)
    & ssList(esk4_0)
    & esk2_0 = esk4_0
    & esk1_0 = esk3_0
    & neq(esk2_0,nil)
    & ~ neq(esk1_0,nil)
    & ( nil = esk3_0
      | nil != esk4_0 )
    & ( ssItem(esk5_0)
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
    & ( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) )
    & ( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
      | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ ssList(X3)
      | ~ ssItem(X4)
      | nil != cons(X4,X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax21])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk2_0,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk5_0)
    | ~ neq(esk4_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ neq(X3,X4)
        | X3 != X4
        | ~ ssList(X4)
        | ~ ssList(X3) )
      & ( X3 = X4
        | neq(X3,X4)
        | ~ ssList(X4)
        | ~ ssList(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax15])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( nil != cons(X1,X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(esk1_0,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    nil != esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : SWC217+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 23:21:40 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/1.36  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.18/1.36  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.18/1.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 0.18/1.36  
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof found!
% 0.18/1.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/1.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.18/1.36  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.18/1.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.18/1.36  # Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.18/1.36  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 73
% 0.18/1.36  # Initial clauses                      : 50
% 0.18/1.36  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 50
% 0.18/1.36  # Processed clauses                    : 52
% 0.18/1.36  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.18/1.36  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 0.18/1.36  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.18/1.36  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Generated clauses                    : 138
% 0.18/1.36  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 112
% 0.18/1.36  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Paramodulations                      : 129
% 0.18/1.36  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.18/1.36  # Current number of processed clauses  : 46
% 0.18/1.36  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.18/1.36  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/1.36  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.18/1.36  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 32
% 0.18/1.36  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 110
% 0.18/1.36  # ...number of literals in the above   : 634
% 0.18/1.36  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 102
% 0.18/1.36  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.18/1.36  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.18/1.36  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/1.36  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6304
% 0.18/1.36  
% 0.18/1.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/1.36  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.18/1.36  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.18/1.36  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.18/1.36  # Maximum resident set size: 3180 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------