TSTP Solution File: SWC210+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:00:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  193 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  212 (  58   ~;  45   |;  90   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  16   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f179,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f156,f161,f164,f178]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ( spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f177]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f175,f131]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ~ singletonP(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ~ singletonP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2mAZLdg5bP/Vampire---4.8_21675',ax39) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ( singletonP(nil)
    | spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f160,f170]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | spl5_1 ),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f116,f130,f151,f127]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | neq(X0,X1)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2mAZLdg5bP/Vampire---4.8_21675',ax15) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK2,nil)
    | spl5_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f149]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ( spl5_1
  <=> neq(sK2,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_1])]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2mAZLdg5bP/Vampire---4.8_21675',ax17) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
        & neq(sK1,nil) )
      | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
        & singletonP(sK2)
        & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
    & sK0 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f99,f106,f105,f104,f103]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                        & neq(X1,nil) )
                      | ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                        & singletonP(X2)
                        & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
                      & singletonP(X2)
                      & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                  & sK0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                    & neq(X1,nil) )
                  | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
                    & singletonP(X2)
                    & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                & sK0 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                  & neq(sK1,nil) )
                | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
                  & singletonP(X2)
                  & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
              & sK0 = X2
              & sK1 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                & neq(sK1,nil) )
              | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
                & singletonP(X2)
                & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
            & sK0 = X2
            & sK1 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
              & neq(sK1,nil) )
            | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
              & singletonP(sK2)
              & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
          & sK0 = sK2
          & sK1 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
            & neq(sK1,nil) )
          | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
            & singletonP(sK2)
            & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
        & sK0 = sK2
        & sK1 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
          & neq(sK1,nil) )
        | ( ~ neq(sK0,nil)
          & singletonP(sK2)
          & neq(sK1,nil) ) )
      & sK0 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                      & singletonP(X2)
                      & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X3,nil)
                      & neq(X1,nil) )
                    | ( ~ neq(X0,nil)
                      & singletonP(X2)
                      & neq(X1,nil) ) )
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                        & ( neq(X0,nil)
                          | ~ singletonP(X2)
                          | ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( ( neq(X3,nil)
                        | ~ neq(X1,nil) )
                      & ( neq(X0,nil)
                        | ~ singletonP(X2)
                        | ~ neq(X1,nil) ) )
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2mAZLdg5bP/Vampire---4.8_21675',co1) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    ( singletonP(sK2)
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f158]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ( spl5_3
  <=> singletonP(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_3])]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    spl5_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f147,f153]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ( spl5_2
  <=> neq(sK3,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_2])]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    neq(sK3,nil),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f139]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ( neq(sK3,nil)
    | neq(sK3,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f120,f118,f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ( neq(sK1,nil)
    | neq(sK1,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ( spl5_3
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f124,f153,f158]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | singletonP(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f135,f153,f149]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ~ neq(sK2,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f125,f119]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ~ neq(sK0,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SWC210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:16:56 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2mAZLdg5bP/Vampire---4.8_21675
% 0.55/0.75  % (21871)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21873)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21875)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21872)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21874)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21876)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (21878)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75  
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)Memory used [KB]: 1128
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (21878)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75  % (21877)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (21874)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.76  % (21879)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (21876)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.76  % (21873)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (21874)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (21860)Success in time 0.383 s
% 0.55/0.76  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------