TSTP Solution File: SWC208-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SWC208-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:39:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  11   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f232,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f221,f223,f231]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f230]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f229,f224]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ( neq(nil,nil)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f200,f209]) ).

fof(f209,plain,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f207]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> nil = sk4 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f200,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190]) ).

fof(f190,axiom,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

fof(f192,axiom,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    ( ~ neq(nil,nil)
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f198,f218]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f216]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> nil = sk3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ~ neq(sk3,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f193,f191]) ).

fof(f191,axiom,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

fof(f193,axiom,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f222,f207]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    nil = sk4,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f194,f198]) ).

fof(f194,axiom,
    ( neq(sk3,nil)
    | nil = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    spl0_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f220,f216]) ).

fof(f220,plain,
    nil = sk3,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f196,f198]) ).

fof(f196,axiom,
    ( neq(sk3,nil)
    | nil = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem    : SWC208-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.08/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:38:10 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.48  % (16666)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (16667)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (16675)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (16675)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.49  % (16675)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.49  % (16675)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.50  % (16674)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.16/0.50  % (16683)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  % (16667)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  % (16659)Success in time 0.165 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------