TSTP Solution File: SWC207-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SWC207-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:10:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 21 ~; 21 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f590,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f587,f564]) ).
fof(f564,plain,
~ neq(nil,nil),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f234,f560]) ).
fof(f560,plain,
nil = sk3,
inference(resolution,[],[f559,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f559,plain,
( ~ ssList(nil)
| nil = sk3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f554,f233]) ).
fof(f233,plain,
ssList(sk3),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f186,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f186,axiom,
ssList(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).
fof(f554,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk3)
| nil = sk3
| ~ ssList(nil) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f100,f234]) ).
fof(f100,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( neq(X1,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| X0 = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause100) ).
fof(f234,plain,
~ neq(sk3,nil),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f193,f191]) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
~ neq(sk1,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f587,plain,
neq(nil,nil),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f235,f584]) ).
fof(f584,plain,
nil = sk4,
inference(resolution,[],[f583,f8]) ).
fof(f583,plain,
( ~ ssList(nil)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f581]) ).
fof(f581,plain,
( ~ ssList(nil)
| nil = sk4
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f578,f194]) ).
fof(f194,axiom,
( ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
fof(f578,plain,
( ~ ssItem(sk5)
| ~ ssList(nil)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f574]) ).
fof(f574,plain,
( nil != nil
| ~ ssList(nil)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f385,f560]) ).
fof(f385,plain,
( nil != sk3
| ~ ssList(nil)
| ~ ssItem(sk5)
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f98,f196]) ).
fof(f196,axiom,
( sk3 = cons(sk5,nil)
| nil = sk4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
fof(f98,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( nil != cons(X0,X1)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause98) ).
fof(f235,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f192,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWC207-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 04:03:35 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % (21485)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.38 % (21488)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.38 % (21487)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21489)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21486)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21488)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21491)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21490)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (21492)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.39 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.40 % (21488)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)Memory used [KB]: 1322
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)Time elapsed: 0.024 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)Instructions burned: 40 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (21491)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (21485)Success in time 0.044 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------