TSTP Solution File: SWC207+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWC207+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:00:36 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.62s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  323 ( 106 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   34 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  391 ( 121   ~; 110   |; 135   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  19  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (  37   !;  37   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f316,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f254,f255,f263,f266,f311]) ).

fof(f311,plain,
    ( ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_4
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f310]) ).

fof(f310,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_4
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f309,f185]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OpNqN1QWvi/Vampire---4.8_19087',ax17) ).

fof(f309,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_4
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f303,f246]) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    ( ssItem(sK4)
    | ~ spl11_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f244]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    ( spl11_5
  <=> ssItem(sK4) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_5])]) ).

fof(f303,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f296]) ).

fof(f296,plain,
    ( nil != nil
    | ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f179,f284]) ).

fof(f284,plain,
    ( nil = cons(sK4,nil)
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f241,f231]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f229]) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    ( spl11_2
  <=> nil = sK2 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_2])]) ).

fof(f241,plain,
    ( sK2 = cons(sK4,nil)
    | ~ spl11_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f239]) ).

fof(f239,plain,
    ( spl11_4
  <=> sK2 = cons(sK4,nil) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_4])]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( cons(X1,X0) != X0
      | ~ ssItem(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( cons(X1,X0) != X0
          | ~ ssItem(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssItem(X1)
         => cons(X1,X0) != X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OpNqN1QWvi/Vampire---4.8_19087',ax18) ).

fof(f266,plain,
    spl11_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f265,f229]) ).

fof(f265,plain,
    nil = sK2,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f264,f156]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( ( ( nil = sK2
        & nil = sK3 )
      | ( ! [X5] :
            ( ~ leq(sK4,X5)
            | ~ memberP(sK3,X5)
            | sK4 = X5
            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
        & memberP(sK3,sK4)
        & sK2 = cons(sK4,nil)
        & ssItem(sK4) ) )
    & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
    & neq(sK1,nil)
    & sK0 = sK2
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f99,f133,f132,f131,f130,f129]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ? [X2] :
                ( ? [X3] :
                    ( ( ( nil = X2
                        & nil = X3 )
                      | ? [X4] :
                          ( ! [X5] :
                              ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                              | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                              | X4 = X5
                              | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                          & memberP(X3,X4)
                          & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                          & ssItem(X4) ) )
                    & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                    & neq(X1,nil)
                    & X0 = X2
                    & X1 = X3
                    & ssList(X3) )
                & ssList(X2) )
            & ssList(X1) )
        & ssList(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                            | X4 = X5
                            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & sK0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ? [X2] :
            ( ? [X3] :
                ( ( ( nil = X2
                    & nil = X3 )
                  | ? [X4] :
                      ( ! [X5] :
                          ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                          | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                          | X4 = X5
                          | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                      & memberP(X3,X4)
                      & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                      & ssItem(X4) ) )
                & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
                & neq(X1,nil)
                & sK0 = X2
                & X1 = X3
                & ssList(X3) )
            & ssList(X2) )
        & ssList(X1) )
   => ( ? [X2] :
          ( ? [X3] :
              ( ( ( nil = X2
                  & nil = X3 )
                | ? [X4] :
                    ( ! [X5] :
                        ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                        | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                        | X4 = X5
                        | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                    & memberP(X3,X4)
                    & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                    & ssItem(X4) ) )
              & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
              & neq(sK1,nil)
              & sK0 = X2
              & sK1 = X3
              & ssList(X3) )
          & ssList(X2) )
      & ssList(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( ? [X2] :
        ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( nil = X2
                & nil = X3 )
              | ? [X4] :
                  ( ! [X5] :
                      ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                      | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                      | X4 = X5
                      | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                  & memberP(X3,X4)
                  & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                  & ssItem(X4) ) )
            & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
            & neq(sK1,nil)
            & sK0 = X2
            & sK1 = X3
            & ssList(X3) )
        & ssList(X2) )
   => ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( nil = sK2
              & nil = X3 )
            | ? [X4] :
                ( ! [X5] :
                    ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                    | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                    | X4 = X5
                    | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                & memberP(X3,X4)
                & cons(X4,nil) = sK2
                & ssItem(X4) ) )
          & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
          & neq(sK1,nil)
          & sK0 = sK2
          & sK1 = X3
          & ssList(X3) )
      & ssList(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ( ( nil = sK2
            & nil = X3 )
          | ? [X4] :
              ( ! [X5] :
                  ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                  | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                  | X4 = X5
                  | ~ ssItem(X5) )
              & memberP(X3,X4)
              & cons(X4,nil) = sK2
              & ssItem(X4) ) )
        & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
        & neq(sK1,nil)
        & sK0 = sK2
        & sK1 = X3
        & ssList(X3) )
   => ( ( ( nil = sK2
          & nil = sK3 )
        | ? [X4] :
            ( ! [X5] :
                ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                | ~ memberP(sK3,X5)
                | X4 = X5
                | ~ ssItem(X5) )
            & memberP(sK3,X4)
            & cons(X4,nil) = sK2
            & ssItem(X4) ) )
      & ~ neq(sK0,nil)
      & neq(sK1,nil)
      & sK0 = sK2
      & sK1 = sK3
      & ssList(sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ( ? [X4] :
        ( ! [X5] :
            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
            | ~ memberP(sK3,X5)
            | X4 = X5
            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
        & memberP(sK3,X4)
        & cons(X4,nil) = sK2
        & ssItem(X4) )
   => ( ! [X5] :
          ( ~ leq(sK4,X5)
          | ~ memberP(sK3,X5)
          | sK4 = X5
          | ~ ssItem(X5) )
      & memberP(sK3,sK4)
      & sK2 = cons(sK4,nil)
      & ssItem(sK4) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                            | X4 = X5
                            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( ( ( nil = X2
                      & nil = X3 )
                    | ? [X4] :
                        ( ! [X5] :
                            ( ~ leq(X4,X5)
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X5)
                            | X4 = X5
                            | ~ ssItem(X5) )
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & ssItem(X4) ) )
                  & ~ neq(X0,nil)
                  & neq(X1,nil)
                  & X0 = X2
                  & X1 = X3
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( ( ( nil != X2
                          | nil != X3 )
                        & ! [X4] :
                            ( ssItem(X4)
                           => ( ? [X5] :
                                  ( leq(X4,X5)
                                  & memberP(X3,X5)
                                  & X4 != X5
                                  & ssItem(X5) )
                              | ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                              | cons(X4,nil) != X2 ) ) )
                      | neq(X0,nil)
                      | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                      | X0 != X2
                      | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( ( ( nil != X2
                        | nil != X3 )
                      & ! [X4] :
                          ( ssItem(X4)
                         => ( ? [X5] :
                                ( leq(X4,X5)
                                & memberP(X3,X5)
                                & X4 != X5
                                & ssItem(X5) )
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X4)
                            | cons(X4,nil) != X2 ) ) )
                    | neq(X0,nil)
                    | ~ neq(X1,nil)
                    | X0 != X2
                    | X1 != X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OpNqN1QWvi/Vampire---4.8_19087',co1) ).

fof(f264,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | ~ ssList(sK2) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f257,f185]) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(sK2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f211,f182]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( neq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OpNqN1QWvi/Vampire---4.8_19087',ax15) ).

fof(f211,plain,
    ~ neq(sK2,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f161,f159]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ~ neq(sK0,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    ( ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f262]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl11_2
    | ~ spl11_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f260,f258]) ).

fof(f258,plain,
    ( ~ neq(nil,nil)
    | ~ spl11_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f211,f231]) ).

fof(f260,plain,
    ( neq(nil,nil)
    | ~ spl11_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f212,f251]) ).

fof(f251,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ spl11_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f249]) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ( spl11_6
  <=> nil = sK3 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl11_6])]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    neq(sK3,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f160,f158]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f160,plain,
    neq(sK1,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f255,plain,
    ( spl11_5
    | spl11_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f162,f249,f244]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ssItem(sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f254,plain,
    ( spl11_4
    | spl11_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f163,f249,f239]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | sK2 = cons(sK4,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWC207+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:51:29 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.OpNqN1QWvi/Vampire---4.8_19087
% 0.62/0.79  % (19286)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19283)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19280)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19282)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19288)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19284)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19285)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.79  % (19287)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19288)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.62/0.80  
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)Memory used [KB]: 1157
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80  % (19288)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.80  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.80  
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)Memory used [KB]: 1184
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80  % (19286)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80  % (19251)Success in time 0.437 s
% 0.62/0.80  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------