TSTP Solution File: SWC206-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWC206-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:42:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 21 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 22 ~; 20 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 0 usr; 3 ari)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 3 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 6 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_21,type,
sQ1_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_22,type,
sQ2_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_23,type,
sQ3_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).
fof(f839,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f835,f823]) ).
fof(f823,plain,
~ neq(nil,nil),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f294,f817]) ).
fof(f817,plain,
nil = sk3,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f816,f383]) ).
fof(f383,plain,
ssList(sk3),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f188]) ).
fof(f188,axiom,
ssList(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).
fof(f816,plain,
( ~ ssList(sk3)
| nil = sk3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f811,f275]) ).
fof(f275,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
fof(f811,plain,
( nil = sk3
| ~ ssList(nil)
| ~ ssList(sk3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f353,f294]) ).
fof(f353,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( neq(X1,X0)
| X0 = X1
| ~ ssList(X0)
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f100,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( neq(X1,X0)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| X0 = X1
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause100) ).
fof(f294,plain,
~ neq(sk3,nil),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f199]) ).
fof(f199,plain,
~ neq(sk3,nil),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f193,f191]) ).
fof(f191,axiom,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
fof(f193,axiom,
~ neq(sk1,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
fof(f835,plain,
neq(nil,nil),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f584,f827]) ).
fof(f827,plain,
nil = sk5,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f826,f581]) ).
fof(f581,plain,
ssList(sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f348,f283]) ).
fof(f283,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f202]) ).
fof(f202,plain,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f192,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
fof(f192,axiom,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
fof(f348,plain,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssList(sk5) ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f195]) ).
fof(f195,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ssList(sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).
fof(f826,plain,
( nil = sk5
| ~ ssList(sk5) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f822,f400]) ).
fof(f400,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ segmentP(nil,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0)
| nil = X0 ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f80]) ).
fof(f80,axiom,
! [X0] :
( nil = X0
| ~ segmentP(nil,X0)
| ~ ssList(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause80) ).
fof(f822,plain,
segmentP(nil,sk5),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f585,f817]) ).
fof(f585,plain,
segmentP(sk3,sk5),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f401,f283]) ).
fof(f401,plain,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| segmentP(sk3,sk5) ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f198]) ).
fof(f198,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| segmentP(sk3,sk5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).
fof(f584,plain,
neq(sk5,nil),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f274,f283]) ).
fof(f274,plain,
( neq(sk5,nil)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f196]) ).
fof(f196,axiom,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| neq(sk5,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWC206-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 18:31:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.48 % (27042)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.17/0.48 % (27059)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.17/0.48 % (27050)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.17/0.49 % (27051)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.17/0.50 % (27043)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27058)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.17/0.51
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Time elapsed: 0.077 s
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51 % (27043)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.51 % (27046)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27048)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27050)First to succeed.
% 0.17/0.51 % (27047)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.17/0.51 % (27049)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.52
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Memory used [KB]: 6396
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.52 % (27050)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.52 % (27035)Success in time 0.186 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------